From: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@mail.ru>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] 2.4 devfs deadlock on concurrent lookups on non-existent entry
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 22:55:28 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200305072255.28504.arvidjaar@mail.ru> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2074 bytes --]
This problem has first been reported for over two years ago. Usually it
happened during system boot using RH initscripts with two minilogds hanging
on access to /dev/log and blocking rc.sysinit; this condition was triggered
by unrelated bug in minilogd.
Pavel Roskin provided detailed debug info for this problem; details including
stack are available at
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85621>. It turned out a
deadlock between devfs_lookup and devfs_d_revalidate_wait for cases when
->d_revalidate was called under parent->i_sem (mostly all places where
lookup_hash was used). The deadlock looked like:
path_lookup("dev/log", LOOKUP_PARENT, &nd);
-> yields dentry for </dev>
path_lookup("dev/log", LOOKUP_PARENT, &nd);
-> yields dentry for </dev>
down(</dev>->i_sem) holds i_sem
down(</dev>->i_sem) - sleeps
lookup_hash("log", </dev>) .
devfs_lookup(</dev>, "log") .
MISS .
try_modload
set "log"->d_op to &devfs_wait_dops; .
init "log"->wait_queue .
up(</dev>->i_sem) .
.
obtains i_sem
lookup_hash("log", </dev>);
cached_lookup(</dev>, "log", 0)
devfs_d_revalidate_wait("log", 0)
wait on "log"->wait_queue
... waits to be waked up by devfs_lookup
down(</dev>->i_sem)
the patch fixes it by moving i_sem re-acquire after
wake_up(&lookup_info.wait_queue). It does not look like it adds any
additional races. Please check.
Pavel said it applies unchanged to 2.5 tree. Which may indicate it has the
same race condition. I do not have 2.5 available.
please consider for 2.4.21
regards
-andrey
[-- Attachment #2: devfs.minilogd.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 841 bytes --]
--- linux-2.4.21-0.13mdk/fs/devfs/base.c.minilogd 2002-11-29 02:53:15.000000000 +0300
+++ linux-2.4.21-0.13mdk/fs/devfs/base.c 2003-05-06 00:41:35.000000000 +0400
@@ -3038,7 +3038,6 @@ static struct dentry *devfs_lookup (stru
revalidation */
up (&dir->i_sem);
wait_for_devfsd_finished (fs_info); /* If I'm not devfsd, must wait */
- down (&dir->i_sem); /* Grab it again because them's the rules */
de = lookup_info.de;
/* If someone else has been so kind as to make the inode, we go home
early */
@@ -3068,6 +3067,7 @@ out:
write_lock (&parent->u.dir.lock);
wake_up (&lookup_info.wait_queue);
write_unlock (&parent->u.dir.lock);
+ down (&dir->i_sem); /* Grab it again because them's the rules */
devfs_put (de);
return retval;
} /* End Function devfs_lookup */
reply other threads:[~2003-05-07 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200305072255.28504.arvidjaar@mail.ru \
--to=arvidjaar@mail.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome