From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262097AbTELMbL (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 May 2003 08:31:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262098AbTELMbL (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 May 2003 08:31:11 -0400 Received: from phoenix.infradead.org ([195.224.96.167]:9998 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262097AbTELMbK (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 May 2003 08:31:10 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 13:43:53 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Pavel Machek Cc: kernel list Subject: Re: ioctl32: kill code duplication (sparc64 tester wanted) Message-ID: <20030512134353.A28931@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Pavel Machek , kernel list References: <20030512114055.GA3539@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030512114055.GA3539@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>; from pavel@ucw.cz on Mon, May 12, 2003 at 01:40:55PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 01:40:55PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > Attached patch shares ioctl32 handles between x86-64 and sparc64 (and > it should be possible/easy to share with other archs, too). > > I'd like sparc64 person to test/comment on it... I don't have a sparc64, but there's certainly no for that arch.. Also #including c files is ugly as hell. What's the #ifdef INCLUDES supposed to help?