From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S262221AbTERWCa (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Sun, 18 May 2003 18:02:30 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262222AbTERWCa
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Sun, 18 May 2003 18:02:30 -0400
Received: from [155.223.251.1] ([155.223.251.1]:8399 "HELO
	gatekeeper.ege.edu.tr") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id S262221AbTERWCa (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 18 May 2003 18:02:30 -0400
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 01:27:42 +0300
From: Halil Demirezen <nitrium@bilmuh.ege.edu.tr>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: about buffer overflow.
Message-ID: <20030518222742.GA20916@bilmuh.ege.edu.tr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-URL: http://www.pisus.com
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Maybe it is silly to ask but,
is there a default protection for buffer overflows in kernels versioned above 2.4.20 ??


sincerely.