From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263600AbTETG6Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 May 2003 02:58:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263612AbTETG6Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 May 2003 02:58:16 -0400 Received: from pao-ex01.pao.digeo.com ([12.47.58.20]:56625 "EHLO pao-ex01.pao.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263600AbTETG6P (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 May 2003 02:58:15 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 00:13:34 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Greg KH Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mochel@osdl.org Subject: Re: problem with sysfs symlink "fix" Message-Id: <20030520001334.6f77d7ee.akpm@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: <20030520001052.GA28067@kroah.com> References: <20030520001052.GA28067@kroah.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.0pre1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 May 2003 07:11:10.0049 (UTC) FILETIME=[FD56B510:01C31E9E] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greg KH wrote: > > Could your fix to fs/sysfs/symlink.c have caused this? Yes. I completely misread the code. It needs to be reverted. Sorry about that.