From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262568AbTETAN6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2003 20:13:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262718AbTETAN5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2003 20:13:57 -0400 Received: from 12-226-168-214.client.attbi.com ([12.226.168.214]:49036 "EHLO marta.kurtwerks.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262568AbTETAN4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2003 20:13:56 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 20:26:53 -0400 From: Kurt Wall To: reiserfs-dev@namesys.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove 'strchr' warning from reiserfs Message-ID: <20030520002653.GE21836@kurtwerks.com> References: <20030517191611.GA10417@mars.ravnborg.org> <20030519124712.2c4b692d.shemminger@osdl.org> <20030519213315.GA1069@mars.ravnborg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030519213315.GA1069@mars.ravnborg.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.20-xfs X-Woot: Woot! Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org An unnamed Administration source, Sam Ravnborg, wrote: % On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 12:47:12PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: % > % > Is this gcc behaviour documented anywhere? % % I dropped a mail to gcc-bugs - the reply was: % % ======= % The kernel is a special case; GCC is entitled to assume the existence of % standard C library functions. % ======= % % So when messing with standard functions we may expect a few suprises, % which I think is fair enough. Hmm. And -nostdlib (or -nodefaultlibs) doesn't catch it? K -- According to Kentucky state law, every person must take a bath at least once a year.