From: Jean Tourrilhes <jt@bougret.hpl.hp.com>
To: Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ted Kremenek <kremenek@cs.stanford.edu>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [CHECKER] 12 potential leaks in kernel 2.5.69
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 10:34:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030522173453.GA9303@bougret.hpl.hp.com> (raw)
Ted Kremenek wrote :
>
> linux-2.5.69/net/irda/af_irda.c (lines 868-911)
> [BUG/LEAK, kfree_skb not called on error path]
Fixed in the mega "memory-leak" patch that I sent to Jeff a
few days ago :
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=105286497718003&w=2
> linux-2.5.69/drivers/net/wireless/wavelan.c (lines 3012-3041)
> [BUG/LEAK: skb_padto may return new address. Note certain what
> the exact semantics are, but skb_padto returns possibly
> a new skb. It also may free the skb pointer passed to
> it, meaning the calling function may have a dangling reference.]
>
> printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: ->wavelan_packet_xmit(0x%X)\n", dev->name,
> (unsigned) skb);
> #endif
>
> if (skb->len < ETH_ZLEN) {
> Start --->
> skb = skb_padto(skb, ETH_ZLEN);
>
> ... DELETED 23 lines ...
>
> printk(KERN_INFO "skb has next\n");
> #endif
>
> /* Write packet on the card */
> if(wv_packet_write(dev, skb->data, skb->len))
> Error --->
> return 1; /* We failed */
>
> dev_kfree_skb(skb);
This is very yucky. The memory leak is easy to fix, but the
dandling reference is *very* serious. And I don't see how to fix that
without either changing the behaviour of skb_padto or the semantic of
the xmit API.
Alan, would you mind thinking 2sec about this one ?
Thanks...
Jean
next reply other threads:[~2003-05-22 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-22 17:34 Jean Tourrilhes [this message]
2003-05-23 8:11 ` Ted Kremenek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-22 6:04 Ted Kremenek
2003-05-22 7:46 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-22 10:03 ` Jörn Engel
2003-05-22 9:50 ` Alan Cox
2003-05-26 9:42 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030522173453.GA9303@bougret.hpl.hp.com \
--to=jt@bougret.hpl.hp.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jt@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=kremenek@cs.stanford.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®