From: Thomas Schlichter <schlicht@uni-mannheim.de>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: akpm@digeo.com, mfc@krycek.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Error during compile of 2.5.69-mm8
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 01:47:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200305230147.00730.schlicht@uni-mannheim.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030522.162913.115921853.davem@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: signed data --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1160 bytes --]
On May 23, David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Thomas Schlichter <schlicht@uni-mannheim.de>
> Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 01:28:06 +0200
>
> On May 23, David S. Miller wrote:
> > Yoshfuji posted a patch on linux-kernel to fix this already.
>
> Sorry, I must have missed this patch - that would have made my work
> obsolete -
> but I'd like to see how that supports all the other
> SET_MODULE_OWNER calls from all the other places...
>
> They also should be converted to explicit ->owner references.
Well, I don't think so...
I don't like it if there is a possibility doing it with an initializer, but in
other cases it may increase readability, too...
There was a discussion about SET_MODULE_OWNER here on the list, once.
You can find it here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=104969843600002&r=1&w=2
At the end Rusty made a small patch that never made it into the mainline tree
(even if I think it should have...) His mail with the patch can be found at:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=105065084724249&w=2
(I like the analogy to a mainframe ;-)
Best regards
Thomas Schlichter
[-- Attachment #2: signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-22 23:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-22 13:54 Mads Christensen
2003-05-22 15:29 ` Mads Christensen
2003-05-22 23:10 ` Thomas Schlichter
[not found] ` <20030522160218.57b828db.akpm@digeo.com>
2003-05-22 23:05 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-22 23:28 ` Thomas Schlichter
2003-05-22 23:29 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-22 23:47 ` Thomas Schlichter [this message]
2003-05-22 23:48 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-23 0:13 ` Thomas Schlichter
2003-05-23 0:23 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-23 1:06 ` Thomas Schlichter
2003-05-23 1:16 ` David S. Miller
[not found] <200305230327.57985.schlicht@uni-mannheim.de>
[not found] ` <200305230538.38946.schlicht@uni-mannheim.de>
[not found] ` <20030522.213217.27796203.davem@redhat.com>
2003-05-24 14:36 ` Thomas Schlichter
2003-05-26 2:18 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-26 6:35 ` Thomas Schlichter
2003-05-26 7:04 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200305230147.00730.schlicht@uni-mannheim.de \
--to=schlicht@uni-mannheim.de \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfc@krycek.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®