mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Erich Focht <efocht@hpce.nec.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: LSE <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] Node affine NUMA scheduler extension
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 13:50:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200305271350.16321.efocht@hpce.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030527114042.GH31510@wotan.suse.de>

On Tuesday 27 May 2003 13:40, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > I left the loadbalancer to decide on where the homenode should be. And
> > the decision wasn't good enough (it lead to unbalanced nodes, that's
> > certainly not the case on Opteron :-). So it made sense to have a
> > specialized homenode chooser which considered the node loads instead
> > of changing the normal load balancer.
>
> I have that, but only on exec (similar to what 2.5 mainline does with the
> NUMA scheduler)

Oh, that's fine, then. It's better than just on exec().

> > BTW: do you assign the homenode at first load balancing or at first
> > cross-node balancing?
>
> It's the same on Opteron: each CPU is an own node. The lazy homenode for
> fork/clone is chosen on the first load balance of the new thread.

Ah, you're right :-)

Erich



  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-27 11:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-27  8:31 Erich Focht
2003-05-27  9:11 ` [Lse-tech] " Andi Kleen
2003-05-27  9:54   ` Erich Focht
2003-05-27 10:01     ` Andi Kleen
2003-05-27 11:39       ` Erich Focht
2003-05-27 11:40         ` Andi Kleen
2003-05-27 11:50           ` Erich Focht [this message]
2003-05-27 15:38     ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-05-27 21:28       ` Erich Focht
2003-05-27 21:51         ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-05-28 17:02           ` Erich Focht
2003-05-28 17:13             ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-05-28 18:14               ` Rick Lindsley
2003-05-28 19:32                 ` Martin J. Bligh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200305271350.16321.efocht@hpce.nec.com \
    --to=efocht@hpce.nec.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®