From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264635AbTE1Jc4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2003 05:32:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264637AbTE1Jc4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2003 05:32:56 -0400 Received: from phoenix.infradead.org ([195.224.96.167]:60432 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264635AbTE1Jcz (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2003 05:32:55 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 10:46:03 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Pavel Roskin Cc: devfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Graceful failure in devfs_remove() in 2.5.x Message-ID: <20030528104603.A27503@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Pavel Roskin , devfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from proski@gnu.org on Tue, May 27, 2003 at 11:29:53AM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 11:29:53AM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote: > This patch makes devfs_remove() print an error to the kernel log and > continue. PRINTK is defined in fs/devfs/base.c to report errors in the > cases like this one: Patch looks okay _except_ for use of this gross macro. Just ise plain printk instead.