Re: [PATCH] 2.5 Documentation/CodingStyle ANSI C function declarations.

["Jörn Engel" <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>]

On Fri, 30 May 2003 14:38:07 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, 30 May 2003, Jörn Engel wrote:
> > 
> > How about an all or nothing approach?  If you really want to get rid
> > of K&R, change indentation as well, rip out some of the rather
> > tasteless macros (ZEXPORT, ZEXPORTVA, ZEXTERN, FAR, ...) and so on.
> 
> I'd love to, but I suspect we lack the motivation to do so, and there 
> aren't any obvious upsides. Yes, the code is ugly, but it's also fairly 
> stable so people seldom need to look at it.

Well, since I'm currently working on the zlib anyway...

> The motivation for doing the ANSI-fication is just that there is now a 
> sanity checker tool that will complain loudly about bad typing, and since 
> I wrote it and I hate old-style K&R sources, it doesn't parse them. 

Sounds nice.  Did I miss it on lkml, or haven't you made it public
yet?

> I wouldn't mind syncing more, but one reason _against_ syncing the zlib 
> sources have been the ugliness of them. Is there any reason for the 
> K&R'ness any more, or the strange allocators?

The allocaters could be useful when lots of zlibs are fighting over
scarce memory, at least when operating in userspace.  K&R and
indentation seem to be personal style (inflate and deflate also have a
different style, when you look closely).  FAR, uInt and friends should
be portability wrappers, there was even a turboc bugfix in the code
before 1.1.4.

Who knows, the performance might even slightly improve after shaving
off some of the useless wrappers.

Jörn

-- 
Geld macht nicht glücklich.
Glück macht nicht satt.