From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264366AbTEaO7D (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 May 2003 10:59:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264376AbTEaO7D (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 May 2003 10:59:03 -0400 Received: from natsmtp00.webmailer.de ([192.67.198.74]:17114 "EHLO post.webmailer.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264366AbTEaO66 (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 May 2003 10:58:58 -0400 Message-Id: <200305311512.h4VFCHhj010685@post.webmailer.de> From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH] Exception trace for i386, mark II To: Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 16:39:37 +0200 References: <20030531121008$2041@gated-at.bofh.it> User-Agent: KNode/0.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andi Kleen wrote: > > This is a new implementation of exception trace for i386. > > It adds a new exception-trace sysctl (default to off), which when enabled > triggers printk for unhandled fault signals (SIGSEGV etc.). Isn't this very similar to the KERN_S390_USER_DEBUG_LOGGING sysctl? Maybe the code can be merged, or at least they can use the same numeric value for the sysctl. Arnd <><