From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262164AbTFBK5Q (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2003 06:57:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262165AbTFBK5Q (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2003 06:57:16 -0400 Received: from pusa.informat.uv.es ([147.156.10.98]:63655 "EHLO pusa.informat.uv.es") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262164AbTFBK5P (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2003 06:57:15 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 13:10:37 +0200 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: SCO's claims seem empty Message-ID: <20030602111037.GA32253@pusa.informat.uv.es> References: <1054512915.1620.2.camel@localhost> <200306020119.h521Jbdv003050@eeyore.valparaiso.cl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200306020119.h521Jbdv003050@eeyore.valparaiso.cl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: uaca@alumni.uv.es Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello everybody let me speculate what we will see when SCO shows their "assumed proofs" they will show code of the kernel and they will claim that was previously on SCO's operating system (and was made by them without a GPL license), how to refute that? Ulisses Debian GNU/Linux: a dream come true ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Computers are useless. They can only give answers." Pablo Picasso ---> Visita http://www.valux.org/ para saber acerca de la <--- ---> Asociación Valenciana de Usuarios de Linux <---