From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264192AbTFBWGb (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2003 18:06:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264197AbTFBWGb (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2003 18:06:31 -0400 Received: from pao-ex01.pao.digeo.com ([12.47.58.20]:3346 "EHLO pao-ex01.pao.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264192AbTFBWGa (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Jun 2003 18:06:30 -0400 Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 15:16:44 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Con Kolivas Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, piggin@cyberone.com.au Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.70-mm2 with contest Message-Id: <20030602151644.06252b28.akpm@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: <200306030806.49885.kernel@kolivas.org> References: <200306030806.49885.kernel@kolivas.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.0pre1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jun 2003 22:19:56.0350 (UTC) FILETIME=[18EAB5E0:01C32955] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Con Kolivas wrote: > > io_load: > Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio > 2.5.69 4 343 22.7 120.5 19.8 4.29 > 2.5.69-mm3 4 319 24.5 105.3 18.1 4.04 > 2.5.69-mm5 4 137 56.9 49.6 19.0 1.73 > 2.5.69-mm6 4 150 52.0 53.4 18.7 1.92 > 2.5.70 5 326 21.5 112.9 18.7 4.13 > 2.5.70-mm2 4 115 67.0 42.0 19.1 1.47 > large drop in time with one large file write We're hitting nearly 90% CPU here. That is really excellent. > I tried getting runs on 2.5.69-mm9 and 2.5.70-mm1 but ran into BUGs that have > been reported before on lkml. mm3 should be OK. After several days more testing I have not found any bugs in mm3's ext3 which are not already in 2.5.70 ;)