From: Matthew Dharm <mdharm-kernel@one-eyed-alien.net>
To: Jocelyn Mayer <jma@netgem.com>
Cc: linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] ieee1394 sbp2 driver is broken for kernel >= 2.4.21-rc2
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 16:01:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030603160117.D21083@one-eyed-alien.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1054674754.4951.184.camel@jma1.dev.netgem.com>; from jma@netgem.com on Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 11:12:34PM +0200
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1362 bytes --]
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 11:12:34PM +0200, Jocelyn Mayer wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-06-03 at 22:25, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> > I know jumping in the middle of a conversation is bad, but....
> >
> > In conversations with the SBP2 folks, they indicated to me that the way
> > they do hotplugging is very different from the way usb-storage does it.
> > The end result (I'm told) is that invoking a scan from userspace is often
> > needed for SBP2 but never for usb-storage.
> >
> > So, comparing the two is really pointless.
>
> you're right, I just wanted to point that there's no reason
> that we need to register a device etheir by hand or using
> an "infamous script" (citation from Ben Collins
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=4435485 )
> due to the SCSI stack, but that it's only a SBP2 problem.
Actually, it is/was a SCSI problem. The short version being that it is/was
easier to hotplug an entire HBA rather than an individual device. That is
being changed in 2.5 right now. usb-storage used an HBA-per-device, while
SBP2 uses a single HBA.
Of course, all this is being changed right now in 2.5.x
Matt
--
Matthew Dharm Home: mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net
Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver
It's monday. It must be monday.
-- Greg
User Friendly, 5/4/1998
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-03 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-02 19:36 Jocelyn Mayer
2003-06-02 20:34 ` Georg Nikodym
2003-06-02 21:20 ` Jocelyn Mayer
2003-06-03 11:36 ` Ben Collins
2003-06-03 18:11 ` Jocelyn Mayer
2003-06-03 18:27 ` Georg Nikodym
2003-06-03 19:01 ` Jocelyn Mayer
2003-06-03 19:34 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-06-03 18:54 ` Ben Collins
2003-06-03 20:20 ` Jocelyn Mayer
2003-06-03 19:26 ` Ben Collins
2003-06-03 21:12 ` Jocelyn Mayer
2003-06-03 19:28 ` Ben Collins
2003-06-03 20:25 ` Matthew Dharm
2003-06-03 21:12 ` Jocelyn Mayer
2003-06-03 23:01 ` Matthew Dharm [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030603160117.D21083@one-eyed-alien.net \
--to=mdharm-kernel@one-eyed-alien.net \
--cc=jma@netgem.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®