Re: strange dependancy generation bug?

[Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>]

On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 08:11:54PM +0100, Stig Brautaset wrote:
> > What happens is that within Makefile.build there is used multi line
> > definition, where each new-line causes make to launch a new sub-shell.
> > The command for the second sub-shell is echoed, even though make is told
> > not to do so. 
> 
> I beg to differ. Since make launches a new subshell, the commands in the
> second subshell is _not_ told to shut up, and thus is echoed. No?

In make a so-called "canned command sequence" is generated.
Quote from 'info make':

	On the other hand, prefix characters on the command line that refers
	to a canned sequence apply to every line in the sequence.  So the rule:

	     frob.out: frob.in
        	     @$(frobnicate)

	does not echo _any_ commands.


In kbuild this is exactly what happens.
So according to make info the command for the second sub-shell should not
be echoed.

	Sam