From: Joe Burks <jburks@wavicle.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Why am I getting Kernel Panic VFS cannot mount root fs on 301?
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:14:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200306041412.27897.jburks@wavicle.org> (raw)
Unfortunately I cannot copy the exact text I'm getting, but it is something
similar to that. Now that I have time again, I desperately need to maintain
drivers/usb/media/vicam.c again and am trying to boot 2.5.70 to do so.
Here's what I've tried:
Freshly installed debian woody
Freshly downloaded 2.5.70
Downloaded, compiled and installed init-module-utils 0.9.12 from Rusty's site.
Downloaded, compiled and installed latest devfsd (although it currently does
not seem to get to a point where this would matter, it never mounts the root
fs in order to start devfsd)
Carefully followed instructions in Documentation/filesystems/devfs/README on
setting up devfs for the impatient.
Configured kernel, including enabling devfs and devfs_mount.
make bzImage modules modules_install install (not in one line, one at a time)
went into lilo.conf and added an append="root=<device>" line, then re-ran
lilo. (where I say <device> I have tried about 100 different possibilities
ranging from easy ones like /dev/hda1 or /dev/discs/disc0/part1 to
/dev/ide/...) Obviously I only get the "301" error when the root= line is
missing and I let lilo write that magic value.
No matter what root= line I supplied it just wouldn't boot. I've also tried
devfs=mount, devfs=nomount all to no solution. So in frustration I rebuilt
the kernel without devfs, since I figured that is where my problem was, but
the exact error is still occurring. I tried both leaving in a root= and
removing the root= append line with devfs not installed.
I can still boot fine with whichever kernel woody installed (2.4.16 I think).
I don't think this is a devfs problem. I think there is some subtle (or maybe
blatantly obvious) kernel option I have not checked which would cause the
whole situation to go away.
Does anybody know what this option is?
Thanks
-Joe
next reply other threads:[~2003-06-04 21:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-04 21:14 Joe Burks [this message]
2003-06-04 21:39 ` Helge Hafting
2003-06-05 7:07 ` Joe Burks
2003-06-05 7:03 ` Martin Schlemmer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200306041412.27897.jburks@wavicle.org \
--to=jburks@wavicle.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®