mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.org.au>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [EVIL-PATCH] getting rid of lib/lib.a and breaking many archs in the processes (was Re: [PATCH] fixed: CRC32=y && 8193TOO=m unresolved symbols)
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 17:33:21 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030607073321.GC1540@cancer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306040838370.13753-100000@home.transmeta.com>

On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 08:41:59AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Any opinions on moving it out of lib/lib.a?
>
> That makes sense. lib/lib.a wasn't ever _that_ sensible, since we only 
> really include object files in it that we know should be linked in. The 
> linker really does know less than the build system, and in this case that 
> seems to be causing a real bug.

This patch needs a couple of extra things before it drops it's evil status, and I'm not sure how to do them exactly.

Instead of going the lib/lib.a route (which I presume was used so that the linker could decide weather to go with arch specific functions or the generic lib/ ones) it leaves it up to the arch to sort it all out. This could be fair enough, as most (14/20) archs seem to implement their own dump_stack anyway. However, bust_spinlocks could be a problem as only i386, mips64, x86_64 and s390 specfically implement it.

Is it a good idea to make the archs themselves include the generic implementation if they don't do it themselves? Or is there a way to detect this in the build system (this would be more elegant, but I have no idea how to do it).

Evil patch that will probably break 16 archs from compiling follows:

diff -urN linux-2.5.70-bk11-orig/Makefile linux-2.5.70-bk11stew1/Makefile
--- linux-2.5.70-bk11-orig/Makefile	2003-06-06 23:55:42.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-2.5.70-bk11stew1/Makefile	2003-06-07 01:09:05.000000000 +1000
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@
 core-y		:= $(patsubst %/, %/built-in.o, $(core-y))
 drivers-y	:= $(patsubst %/, %/built-in.o, $(drivers-y))
 net-y		:= $(patsubst %/, %/built-in.o, $(net-y))
-libs-y		:= $(patsubst %/, %/lib.a, $(libs-y))
+libs-y		:= $(patsubst %/, %/built-in.o, $(libs-y))
 
 ifdef include_config
 
diff -urN linux-2.5.70-bk11-orig/arch/i386/lib/Makefile linux-2.5.70-bk11stew1/arch/i386/lib/Makefile
--- linux-2.5.70-bk11-orig/arch/i386/lib/Makefile	2003-05-05 09:53:01.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-2.5.70-bk11stew1/arch/i386/lib/Makefile	2003-06-07 17:22:39.000000000 +1000
@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
 # Makefile for i386-specific library files..
 #
 
-L_TARGET = lib.a
-
 obj-y = checksum.o delay.o \
 	usercopy.o getuser.o \
 	memcpy.o strstr.o
diff -urN linux-2.5.70-bk11-orig/lib/Makefile linux-2.5.70-bk11stew1/lib/Makefile
--- linux-2.5.70-bk11-orig/lib/Makefile	2003-06-02 23:28:32.000000000 +1000
+++ linux-2.5.70-bk11stew1/lib/Makefile	2003-06-07 17:21:44.000000000 +1000
@@ -6,10 +6,8 @@
 # unless it's something special (ie not a .c file).
 #
 
-L_TARGET := lib.a
-
 obj-y := errno.o ctype.o string.o vsprintf.o cmdline.o \
-	 bust_spinlocks.o rbtree.o radix-tree.o dump_stack.o \
+	 rbtree.o radix-tree.o \
 	 kobject.o idr.o
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK) += rwsem-spinlock.o


  reply	other threads:[~2003-06-07  7:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-03  1:13 CRC32=y && 8193TOO=m unresolved symbols Stewart Smith
2003-06-03 13:16 ` David Woodhouse
2003-06-04  5:56   ` [PATCH] fixed: " Stewart Smith
2003-06-04 15:28     ` Jeff Garzik
2003-06-04 15:30       ` David Woodhouse
2003-06-04 15:32         ` Jeff Garzik
2003-06-04 15:41           ` Linus Torvalds
2003-06-07  7:33             ` Stewart Smith [this message]
2003-06-07  7:39               ` [EVIL-PATCH] getting rid of lib/lib.a and breaking many archs in the processes (was Re: [PATCH] fixed: CRC32=y && 8193TOO=m unresolved symbols) Christoph Hellwig
2003-06-07 17:34               ` Linus Torvalds
2003-06-07 19:02                 ` Sam Ravnborg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030607073321.GC1540@cancer \
    --to=stewart@linux.org.au \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®