Re: [patch] scsi: ten -> use_10_for_rw / use_10_for_ms

[Matthew Dharm <mdharm-kernel@one-eyed-alien.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1252 bytes --]

On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 09:22:44AM +0200, Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:
> In the old days, ancient scsi devices understood 6-byte commands
> and more recent ones also understood 10-byte commands.
> Thus, we had a "ten" flag indicating that 10-byte commands worked.
> 
> These days, especially for usb-storage devices, the opposite
> sometimes holds - 10-byte commands are supported, but 6-byte commands
> are not.
> 
> The patch below changes the field ten into the pair of fields
> use_10_for_rw, use_10_for_ms set initially when the driver
> thinks these are supported. Ifthe device returns ILLEGAL_REQUEST
> they are cleared.
> 
> This patch obsoletes a large amount of code in usb-storage,
> and not only that, once the subsequent patch removes all this
> usb-storage code many devices will work that hang today.

Any idea when you'll submit that patch to usb-storage?

Do you perhaps just want to send what you have to me for integration?

Matt

-- 
Matthew Dharm                              Home: mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net 
Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver

Sir, for the hundreth time, we do NOT carry 600-round boxes of belt-fed 
suction darts!
					-- Salesperson to Greg
User Friendly, 12/30/1997

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]