Re: [PATCH] Some clean up of the time code.

[Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>]

george anzinger <george@mvista.com> wrote:
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > george anzinger <george@mvista.com> wrote:
> > 
> >>-void do_settimeofday(struct timeval *tv)
> >> +int do_settimeofday(struct timespec *tv)
> >>  {
> >> +	if ((unsigned long)tv->tv_nsec > NSEC_PER_SEC)
> >> +		return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> > 
> > 
> > Should that be ">="?
> > 
> > Is there any reasonable way to avoid breaking existing
> > do_settimeofday() implementations? That's just more grief all round.
> 
> Hm. Giving this more thought, the main reason for the change was to 
> move to the timespec from the timeval, i.e. nanoseconds instead of 
> microseconds.  The error check was put in because the function was 
> already being changed.  The reason to move to the timespec is to 
> complete the change made to xtime and to more correctly align with the 
> POSIX clock_settime, both of which use timespec.
> 

Well if it's really the Right Thing To Do then OK.  Was just checking.

About 30 do_settimeofday() implementations need to be repaired.