From: Randolph Bentson <bentson@holmsjoen.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linksys WRT54G and the GPL
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:39:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030611103936.A29520@grieg.holmsjoen.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030611153845.GA16164@fs.tum.de>; from bunk@fs.tum.de on Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 05:38:45PM +0200
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 05:38:45PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> You definitely don't need physical possession of the written offer.
> Otherwise 3c wouldn't work.
You cannot mix the terms of clauses 3a, 3b, and 3c. The "written
offer" is only an element of clause 3b.
A significant point which seems to be glossed over is that the
distributor is the entity which selects which of these clauses,
3a, 3b, or 3c, is to be exercised to satisfy the GPL. Each places
a different obligation on the distributor.
If the distributor elects to distribute the object code or executable
form under clause 3a, the distributor need only distribute copies of
the source to the recipients of the object code or executable form.
If the distributor elects to distribute the object code or executable
form under clause 3b, one might reasonably argue that the distributor
need only distribute the source to those third parties in possession
of the written offer which must be included. Others may argue that
this clause requires that the distributor make the source available
to everyone, but even then the distributor is not obliged to put it
on the web and the distributor may charge for the distribution cost.
If the distributor elects to distribute the object code or executable
form under clause 3c, and is qualified to do so, the distributor
need only distribute the information to those who receive the object
code or executable form. The distributor is not obliged to give
this information to everyone.
Of course, once anyone has a copy of this source, it may be further
distributed under sections 1, 2, or 3.
I'd like to see Linksys elect to distribute under clause 3b by putting
a note in each box with a pointer to source files which everyone
can fetch from their web site. (I believe that web based distribution
qualifies as "a medium customarily used for software interchange"
cited in 3b and that they can simply absorb the cost of this method
of distribution.) Recent news suggests that this will be the case.
Let's hope that they, and other such distributors of embedded GPL
based systems, follow this course.
--
Randolph Bentson
bentson@holmsjoen.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-11 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-08 2:41 Andrew Miklas
2003-06-08 11:54 ` Dave Jones
2003-06-08 14:23 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-08 18:13 ` uaca
2003-06-08 19:44 ` Colm MacCárthaigh
2003-06-08 20:14 ` Jörn Engel
2003-06-08 21:47 ` Russell King
2003-06-09 22:37 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-06-10 22:47 ` Andrew Miklas
2003-06-11 12:42 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-11 14:28 ` Kent Borg
2003-06-09 5:22 ` Frank Cusack
[not found] ` <20030609053010$504e@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-06-09 8:28 ` Florian Weimer
2003-06-09 14:09 ` Horst von Brand
2003-06-09 18:23 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-09 21:33 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-06-09 21:50 ` David Schwartz
2003-06-09 22:21 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-06-10 20:17 ` Randolph Bentson
2003-06-11 15:38 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-06-11 17:39 ` Randolph Bentson [this message]
2003-06-11 19:22 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-06-11 20:12 ` David Schwartz
2003-06-11 20:31 ` "any third party" (Re: Linksys WRT54G and the GPL) Filip Van Raemdonck
2003-06-11 20:51 ` Eli Carter
2003-06-09 5:32 ` Linksys WRT54G and the GPL David Schwartz
2003-06-09 5:47 ` Frank Cusack
2003-06-09 16:53 ` David Schwartz
2003-06-09 18:25 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-09 21:37 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-06-08 3:13 Brad Chapman
2003-06-08 16:35 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-06-08 3:53 Erik Andersen
2003-06-08 10:08 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2003-06-08 12:01 ` Christian Ullrich
2003-06-08 13:52 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2003-06-08 14:05 ` Marcus Metzler
2003-06-08 16:49 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-06-08 17:00 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2003-06-08 20:41 greendisease
2003-06-08 21:08 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-06-08 21:23 ` Jack Aboutboul
2003-06-08 21:50 ` Russell King
2003-06-08 22:48 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-06-08 20:57 Peter Westwood
2003-06-08 21:52 ` Russell King
2003-06-08 23:18 ` bill-linuxkernel20030609
2003-06-09 0:19 ` Oliver M. Bolzer
2003-06-09 0:31 ` Jeff
2003-06-10 20:43 ` Michael Neuffer
2003-06-08 23:25 Hakan Lennestal
2003-06-08 23:55 ` Martin List-Petersen
2003-06-09 8:47 ` Hakan Lennestal
2003-06-08 23:35 Erik Andersen
2003-06-09 0:09 ` Paul Jakma
2003-06-09 1:11 ` Erik Andersen
2003-06-09 0:05 Erik Andersen
2003-06-09 3:39 ` John Shifflett
2003-06-09 18:26 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-09 3:47 Russ Dill
2003-06-09 8:04 ` Russell King
2003-06-09 13:13 Downing, Thomas
2003-06-09 16:49 ` Martin List-Petersen
2003-06-10 4:11 Russ Dill
2003-07-18 23:48 root
2021-01-17 17:51 nipponmail
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030611103936.A29520@grieg.holmsjoen.com \
--to=bentson@holmsjoen.com \
--cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®