From: Chris Wright <chris@wirex.com>
To: torvalds@transmeta.com, akpm@digeo.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@wirex.com,
greg@kroah.com, sds@epoch.ncsc.mil
Subject: Re: [PATCH][LSM] setfsuid/setgsuid bug fix 4/4
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 00:22:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030613002224.G31636@figure1.int.wirex.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030613001908.F31636@figure1.int.wirex.com>; from chris@wirex.com on Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 12:19:08AM -0700
Patch from Jakub Jelínek <jakub@redhat.com>
[LSM] make sure setfsuid/setfsgid return values are right. Before
include/linux/security.h was added, setfsuid/setfsgid always returned
old_fsuid, no matter if the fsuid was actually changed or not. With
the default security ops it seems to do the same, because both
security_task_setuid and security_task_post_setuid return 0, but
these are hooks which seem to return 0 on success, -errno on failure,
so if some non-default security hook is installed and ever returns
-errno in setfsuid/setfsgid, -errno will be returned from the syscall
instead of the expected old_fsuid. This makes it hard to distinguish
uids 0xfffff001 .. 0xffffffff from errors of security hooks.
--- linus-2.5/kernel/sys.c.setfsuid Thu Jun 12 22:53:14 2003
+++ linus-2.5/kernel/sys.c Thu Jun 12 22:53:14 2003
@@ -831,13 +831,11 @@
asmlinkage long sys_setfsuid(uid_t uid)
{
int old_fsuid;
- int retval;
-
- retval = security_task_setuid(uid, (uid_t)-1, (uid_t)-1, LSM_SETID_FS);
- if (retval)
- return retval;
old_fsuid = current->fsuid;
+ if (security_task_setuid(uid, (uid_t)-1, (uid_t)-1, LSM_SETID_FS))
+ return old_fsuid;
+
if (uid == current->uid || uid == current->euid ||
uid == current->suid || uid == current->fsuid ||
capable(CAP_SETUID))
@@ -850,9 +848,7 @@
current->fsuid = uid;
}
- retval = security_task_post_setuid(old_fsuid, (uid_t)-1, (uid_t)-1, LSM_SETID_FS);
- if (retval)
- return retval;
+ security_task_post_setuid(old_fsuid, (uid_t)-1, (uid_t)-1, LSM_SETID_FS);
return old_fsuid;
}
@@ -863,13 +859,11 @@
asmlinkage long sys_setfsgid(gid_t gid)
{
int old_fsgid;
- int retval;
-
- retval = security_task_setgid(gid, (gid_t)-1, (gid_t)-1, LSM_SETID_FS);
- if (retval)
- return retval;
old_fsgid = current->fsgid;
+ if (security_task_setgid(gid, (gid_t)-1, (gid_t)-1, LSM_SETID_FS))
+ return old_fsgid;
+
if (gid == current->gid || gid == current->egid ||
gid == current->sgid || gid == current->fsgid ||
capable(CAP_SETGID))
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-13 7:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-13 7:10 Chris Wright
2003-06-13 7:15 ` [PATCH][LSM] Remove task_kmod_set_label hook 2/4 Chris Wright
2003-06-13 7:19 ` [PATCH][LSM] Remove inode_permission_lite hook 3/4 Chris Wright
2003-06-13 7:22 ` Chris Wright [this message]
2003-06-13 7:30 ` [PATCH][LSM] Early init for security modules 1/4 Chris Wright
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030613002224.G31636@figure1.int.wirex.com \
--to=chris@wirex.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@wirex.com \
--cc=sds@epoch.ncsc.mil \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®