mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Zwickel <martin.zwickel@technotrend.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
Subject: Re: BUG REPORT: Massive performance drop in routing throughput with 2.4.21
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:10:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030616151035.735fcaf2.martin.zwickel@technotrend.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030616145135.0ef5c436.skraw@ithnet.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3296 bytes --]

On my Home-Gateway I have the same problem.
(route 1-1 with iptables)
But I don't know if it's a broken network cable or something else.

Hmm, but before I switched the kernel from 2.0.x to 2.4.21 I thought I had a
better throughput. (my HUB always gives a few collisions, but it was ok)

i have 2 RTL8139 cards:
00:09.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10)
00:0b.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10)


and i still don't know what the carrier means:
eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:50:BF:1A:02:01  
          inet addr:192.168.0.1  Bcast:192.168.0.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:19971100 errors:289699 dropped:1 overruns:20 frame:0
          TX packets:18045589 errors:108785 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:217570
          collisions:46041 txqueuelen:100 
          RX bytes:2036864361 (1942.5 Mb)  TX bytes:808600381 (771.1 Mb)
          Interrupt:11 Base address:0xdf00 

eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:30:84:3D:A3:00  
          inet addr:10.0.0.1  Bcast:10.0.0.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:18179395 errors:110 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:19959609 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:103850 txqueuelen:100 
          RX bytes:1069462782 (1019.9 Mb)  TX bytes:2154547542 (2054.7 Mb)
          Interrupt:5 Base address:0xfe00 


On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 14:51:35 +0200
Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com> bubbled:

> On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 14:47:15 +0200 (CEST)
> Maciej Soltysiak <solt@dns.toxicfilms.tv> wrote:
> 
> > > there seems to be a real serious problem with 2.4.21, routing through two
> > > ethernet-devices. After 24 hours of a routing-only box the throughput from
> > > ethernet a to ethernet b decreased to something around 4-100 kByte/sec
> > > (100 Mbit network 2 cards ns83820). I had to drop using 2.4.21 on this box
> > > because of this. 2.4.20 is flawless on the machine and ran for around 100
> > > days before without any troubles. Going back to 2.4.20 cured it.
> > Are you using any netfilter patch-o-matic patches?
> 
> No.
> 
> > Does it also affect eg. ssh latency even on LAN ?
> 
> Not very seriously.
> 
> > Since I switched my processor from Intel do Amd, I have been experiencing
> > similar but after longer periods of time than yours.
> > 
> > I am also using VIA chipset, maybe it's a hardware driver problem.
> 
> No, my two boxes have differing mb's. One is VIA, the other is Intel440BX.
> 
> But I can also verify that the problem arises with 2.4.21-rc7, too. I guess it
> is effectively an older problem that has not been recognised so far.
> 
> > Regards,
> > Maciej
> 
> Regards,
> Stephan
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Regards,
Martin

-- 
MyExcuse:
The static electricity routing is acting up...

Martin Zwickel <martin.zwickel@technotrend.de>
Research & Development

TechnoTrend AG <http://www.technotrend.de>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2003-06-16 12:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-16 12:18 Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-06-16 12:34 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-06-23  7:14   ` Michael Knigge
2003-06-23 11:42     ` Alan Cox
2003-06-16 12:47 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2003-06-16 12:51   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-06-16 13:10     ` Martin Zwickel [this message]
2003-06-16 18:18       ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2003-06-17 19:33         ` BUG: Massive performance drop in conncetion time with 2.4.21 (62KB) Mr. James W. Laferriere
2003-06-17 20:04           ` David S. Miller
2003-06-18 13:10             ` BUG: Massive performance drop in routing throughput " Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-06-18 14:16               ` Chris Friesen
2003-06-18 17:20               ` David S. Miller
2003-06-19 12:24                 ` Stephan von Krawczynski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030616151035.735fcaf2.martin.zwickel@technotrend.de \
    --to=martin.zwickel@technotrend.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=skraw@ithnet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®