From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264178AbTFPTHz (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:07:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264181AbTFPTHz (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:07:55 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:46747 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264178AbTFPTHz (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:07:55 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 20:21:46 +0100 From: viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk To: "Downing, Thomas" Cc: root@chaos.analogic.com, Patrick Mochel , Christoph Hellwig , torvalds@transmeta.com, david-b@pacbell.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: GFDL in the kernel tree Message-ID: <20030616192146.GR6754@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <170EBA504C3AD511A3FE00508BB89A9202301AF6@exnanycmbx4.ipc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <170EBA504C3AD511A3FE00508BB89A9202301AF6@exnanycmbx4.ipc.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 02:45:55PM -0400, Downing, Thomas wrote: > IMBMSB is the GFDL the 'Gnu Free Documentation License'? > Has Gnu produced a doc license that is incompatible with GPL? > Looks like it...but I can understand the purpose behind the > GFDL. > > Seems like GNU needs a simple doc license a la BSD doc license > to fill the gap between a formally published doc 'GFDL' and the > sort of stuff in the kernel tree 'BSDish'. List name is linux-kernel. Linux is not GNU, so kindly take that to appropriate place (gnu.misc.discuss, alt.tasteless, whatever).