From: "B. D. Elliott" <bde@nwlink.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Sparc64-2.5.72: A Serious Time Problem
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 00:57:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030618073556.94E966A4FC@smtp4.pacifier.net> (raw)
There is a serious bug in setting time on 64-bit sparcs (and probably other
64-bit systems). The symptom is that ntpdate or date set the time back to
1969 or 1970. The underlying problems are that stime is broken, and any
settimeofday call fails with a bad fractional value. Ntpdate falls back to
stime when settimeofday fails.
The settimeofday problem is that the timeval and timespec structures are not
the same size. In particular, the fractional part is an int in timeval, and
a long in timespec. The stime problem is that the argument is not an int,
but a time_t, which is long on at least some 64-bit systems.
The following patch appears to fix this on my sparc64.
===================================================================
--- ./kernel/time.c.orig 2003-06-16 22:36:04.000000000 -0700
+++ ./kernel/time.c 2003-06-18 00:00:43.000000000 -0700
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@
* architectures that need it).
*/
-asmlinkage long sys_stime(int * tptr)
+asmlinkage long sys_stime(time_t * tptr)
{
struct timespec tv;
@@ -162,13 +162,15 @@
asmlinkage long sys_settimeofday(struct timeval __user *tv, struct timezone __user *tz)
{
+ struct timeval user_tv;
struct timespec new_tv;
struct timezone new_tz;
if (tv) {
- if (copy_from_user(&new_tv, tv, sizeof(*tv)))
+ if (copy_from_user(&user_tv, tv, sizeof(*tv)))
return -EFAULT;
- new_tv.tv_nsec *= NSEC_PER_USEC;
+ new_tv.tv_sec = user_tv.tv_sec;
+ new_tv.tv_nsec = user_tv.tv_usec * NSEC_PER_USEC;
}
if (tz) {
if (copy_from_user(&new_tz, tz, sizeof(*tz)))
===================================================================
--
B. D. Elliott bde@nwlink.com
next reply other threads:[~2003-06-18 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-18 7:57 B. D. Elliott [this message]
2003-06-18 9:12 ` george anzinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030618073556.94E966A4FC@smtp4.pacifier.net \
--to=bde@nwlink.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®