From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264368AbTFVJWB (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jun 2003 05:22:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264389AbTFVJWB (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jun 2003 05:22:01 -0400 Received: from pao-ex01.pao.digeo.com ([12.47.58.20]:9988 "EHLO pao-ex01.pao.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264368AbTFVJWA (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jun 2003 05:22:00 -0400 Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 02:36:26 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Samuel.Thibault@ens-lyon.fr, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Permit big console scrolls Message-Id: <20030622023626.60d2a24e.akpm@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: References: <200306210621.h5L6LbUo011422@hera.kernel.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.0pre1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jun 2003 09:36:04.0575 (UTC) FILETIME=[B34FD6F0:01C338A1] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > - if (get_user(lines, (char *)arg+1)) { > ^^^^^ > > + if (get_user(lines, (s32 *)((char *)arg+4))) { > ^^^^^ > > ret = -EFAULT; > > } else { > > scrollfront(lines); > > Why was the `arg+1' changed to `arg+4'? Do we really want to skip 12 bytes? It skips three bytes?