From: "Jörn Engel" <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@conectiva.com.br>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, perex@suse.cz,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Isapnp warning
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 10:39:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030622083901.GA25120@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030622014102.GB29661@dingdong.cryptoapps.com>
On Sat, 21 June 2003 20:41:02 -0500, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 09:11:01PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>
> > Humm, I'd love to do that, i.e. to make gcc 3 required, lots of good
> > stuff like this one, anonymous structs, etc, etc, lots of stuff
> > could be done in an easier way, but are we ready to abandon gcc
> > 2.95.*? Can anyone confirm if gcc 2.96 accepts this?
>
> What *requires* 2.96 still? Is it a large number of people or obscure
> architecture?
Try these two litter things in Assembler code:
#define LONG_MACRO \
asm \
#ifdef something \
asm \
#else \
asm \
asm \
#endif \
asm
Compiles just fine with all 3.x I've tried.
jump 92f
...
81: ...
...
92 ...
Again, compiles just fine.
Both are clearly wrong and should not be in the source code. But
Assembler bugs are subtle, nasty and Code Checkers for Assembler are
rare. My vote is to keep 2.95+ support.
Jörn
--
"Error protection by error detection and correction."
-- from a university class
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-22 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-15 18:36 Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-06-21 12:31 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-21 14:59 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-06-21 15:04 ` Sean Neakums
2003-06-21 19:51 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-21 23:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-06-22 0:11 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-06-22 1:41 ` Chris Wedgwood
2003-06-22 1:43 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-06-22 2:17 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-22 2:27 ` Chris Wedgwood
2003-06-22 2:59 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-22 5:50 ` Herbert Xu
2003-06-22 3:43 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-06-22 4:24 ` Paul Mackerras
2003-06-22 8:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-06-22 13:34 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-06-22 5:39 ` gcc 3.3: largest *and* smallest kernels (was Re: [PATCH] Isapnp warning) Barry K. Nathan
2003-06-22 11:31 ` Alan Cox
2003-06-22 13:22 ` GCC speed (was " Daniel Phillips
2003-06-22 17:32 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-22 17:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-06-22 18:58 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2003-06-22 19:12 ` Sam Ravnborg
2003-06-22 19:13 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-22 19:32 ` Henning Schmiedehausen
2003-06-22 19:51 ` Adrian Bunk
2003-06-22 19:12 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-06-23 1:05 ` Larry McVoy
2002-01-04 11:32 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-17 10:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-07-17 10:23 ` Jakub Jelinek
2003-07-17 10:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-06-22 8:49 ` [PATCH] Isapnp warning Russell King
2003-06-22 8:39 ` Jörn Engel [this message]
2003-06-22 14:07 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-06-22 15:00 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-29 14:49 Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-06-15 19:10 Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-06-09 10:37 Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030622083901.GA25120@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
--to=joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de \
--cc=acme@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@suse.cz \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®