From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264592AbTFYPly (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2003 11:41:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264593AbTFYPly (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2003 11:41:54 -0400 Received: from phoenix.mvhi.com ([195.224.96.167]:26886 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264592AbTFYPlu (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2003 11:41:50 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2003 16:56:00 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Marek Habersack Cc: Steve Lord , Arjan van de Ven , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [2.5.73-mm1 XFS] restrict_chown and quotas Message-ID: <20030625165600.A24244@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Marek Habersack , Steve Lord , Arjan van de Ven , Linux Kernel References: <20030625095126.GD1745@thanes.org> <1056545505.1170.19.camel@laptop.americas.sgi.com> <20030625134129.GG1745@thanes.org> <1056551143.5779.0.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> <20030625153545.A16074@infradead.org> <1056553902.1416.61.camel@laptop.americas.sgi.com> <20030625161627.A20049@infradead.org> <20030625153943.GJ1745@thanes.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030625153943.GJ1745@thanes.org>; from grendel@debian.org on Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 05:39:43PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 05:39:43PM +0200, Marek Habersack wrote: > This being clear, maybe it should be a compile-time option in XFS? Or > would that be unacceptable? Yes. It's also utterly pointless.