From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Peter Osterlund <petero2@telia.com>
Cc: pavel@ucw.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Software suspend testing in 2.6.0-test1
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 03:24:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030718032433.4b6b9281.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2d6g8cg06.fsf@telia.com>
Peter Osterlund <petero2@telia.com> wrote:
>
> If this patch is an acceptable approach to fix the problem,
Seems reasonable.
> the balance_pgdat function should probably be cleaned up.
Well it was rather bolted on the side of the kswapd code. But from an API
perspective, being able to tell it how many page to free is a bit more
flexible. Minor point.
However I'm trying to remember why the code exists at all. Why doesn't
swsusp just allocate lots of pages then free them again?
Something like:
LIST_HEAD(list);
int sleep_count = 0;
while (sleep_count < 10) {
page = __alloc_pages(0, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (page) {
list_add(&page->list, &list);
} else {
blk_congestion_wait(WRITE, HZ/20);
sleep_count++;
}
}
<free all the pages on `list'>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-18 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-17 19:46 Peter Osterlund
2003-07-17 20:00 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-17 20:09 ` Andrew Morton
2003-07-18 9:59 ` Peter Osterlund
2003-07-18 10:24 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2003-07-18 15:22 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-18 15:55 ` Peter Osterlund
2003-07-18 16:45 ` Andrew Morton
2003-07-18 17:50 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-18 18:02 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-07-18 18:04 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-18 21:05 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-18 19:37 ` Andrew Morton
2003-07-18 19:58 ` Peter Osterlund
2003-07-18 20:15 ` Andrew Morton
2003-07-18 22:13 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-20 0:22 ` Peter Osterlund
2003-07-20 1:01 ` Andrew Morton
2003-07-20 7:45 ` Peter Osterlund
2003-07-18 21:05 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-07-21 10:00 ` Peter Osterlund
2003-07-21 12:58 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-21 14:36 ` Peter Osterlund
2003-07-21 21:28 ` Pavel Machek
2003-07-21 23:46 ` Peter Osterlund
2003-07-22 11:04 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030718032433.4b6b9281.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=petero2@telia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®