From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
To: Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl>
Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, geert@linux-m68k.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PATCH: typo bits
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 07:33:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030718073319.37d7863f.rddunlap@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030718152947.B3019@pclin040.win.tue.nl>
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 15:29:47 +0200 Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl> wrote:
| On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 12:36:05PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
|
| > > > - * It's now support isochronous mode and more effective than hc_sl811.o
| > > > + * It's now support isosynchronous mode and more effective than hc_sl811.o
| > >
| > > I thought the correct term was `isochronous'...
| >
| > Perhaps someone can clarify - however isochornus is definitely wrong either way
|
| You are the native English speaker here. Isosynchronous is (was?) not an
| English word.
|
| Oh, but we aren't speaking English - this is about USB devices.
| Read the USB standard and see that it has an isosynchronous mode.
It does? I can't find it in the main USB 2.0 spec.
It discusses isochronous, which is what I would prefer to see,
regardless of the USB spec.
--
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-18 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200307171807.h6HI7j2F016507@hera.kernel.org>
2003-07-18 10:22 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-07-18 11:36 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-18 11:48 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2003-07-18 11:54 ` Scott Robert Ladd
2003-07-18 13:29 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-07-18 14:33 ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
2003-07-18 15:04 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-07-18 15:23 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030718073319.37d7863f.rddunlap@osdl.org \
--to=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=aebr@win.tue.nl \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®