From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270751AbTGUWFv (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2003 18:05:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270752AbTGUWFv (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2003 18:05:51 -0400 Received: from pasmtp.tele.dk ([193.162.159.95]:18190 "EHLO pasmtp.tele.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270751AbTGUWFs (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2003 18:05:48 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 00:20:49 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg To: "Robert P. J. Day" Cc: Linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test1: "make help" is not complete Message-ID: <20030721222049.GA2602@mars.ravnborg.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Robert P. J. Day" , Linux kernel mailing list References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 08:29:37AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > just an observation -- "make help" doesn't list all possible > make options. minimally, "make randconfig" is not listed there, > although i'm not surprised that this feature is not prominently > advertised. :-) "make help" is not for the advanced user. I deliberately did not include the more exotic targets - and you may argue that there is already too many targets listed. I see no reason to include more targets in "make help". Sam