From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270859AbTGVRM3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:12:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270861AbTGVRM3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:12:29 -0400 Received: from mail.jlokier.co.uk ([81.29.64.88]:11392 "EHLO mail.jlokier.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270859AbTGVRM2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2003 13:12:28 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 18:27:22 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier To: Davide Libenzi Cc: "Randy.Dunlap" , lkml Subject: Re: asm (lidt) question Message-ID: <20030722172722.GC3267@mail.jlokier.co.uk> References: <20030717152819.66cfdbaf.rddunlap@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Davide Libenzi wrote: > IMHO, since "var" is really an output parameter. "var" is read, not written. I think you are confusing "lidt" with "sidt". Therefore > __asm__ __volatile__("lidt %0": :"m" (var)); is the better choice, and that's why I wrote it in reboot.c :) -- Jamie