From: "Robert L. Harris" <Robert.L.Harris@rdlg.net>
To: Steven Cole <elenstev@mesatop.com>
Cc: Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>,
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Posting format
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:15:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030724171553.GK32585@rdlg.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1059065578.1668.234.camel@spc9.esa.lanl.gov>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2988 bytes --]
Thus spake Steven Cole (elenstev@mesatop.com):
> On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 10:03, Tomas Szepe wrote:
> > > [Robert.L.Harris@rdlg.net]
> > >
> > > On the other hand if everyone posted at the top it would be considerably
> > > easier reading for those who have been following the conversation
> > > without having to scroll down and figure out where comments and the
> > > conversation is at.
> >
> > So how do you context-quote when replying at the top?
> >
> > Original text:
> >
> > Argument A.
> > Argument B.
> >
> > Reply:
> >
> > Reply intro text.
> >
> > Reaction A.
> > > Argument A.
> >
> > Reaction B.
> > > Argument B.
> >
> > I don't think so. Awkward (mixing directions) and confusing.
> >
> > > For those new to the conversation they can just start at the bottom and
> > > scroll up.
> >
> > Ever actually tried doing that? IMHO it's not half as practical and
> > natural as reading from the top down. (You have to keep scrolling,
> > searching for block starts.)
>
> I think Tomas has just hit upon why top posting is fundamentally wrong.
>
> Indo-European languages read left to right, Semitic languages read right
> to left, and some Oriental languages read top to bottom, but no human
> languages I'm aware of read bottom to top.
>
> Consider a Cafe sign:
>
> C
> a
> f
> e
>
> That is readable. How about:
>
> e
> f
> a
> C
>
> Not very readable unless you spend extra processing time to think about
> it. Reading bottom to top is counter-intuitive and wastes time. Speaking
> of which, apologies to all who feel they've wasted time by reading this.
>
> Hmm, it looks like you top-posters out there are in good company.
> Marcelo seems to be taking the lead. Grumble.
>
I'm not saying you should write your paragraphs backwards such as your
Cafe sign. It's more of an organizational thing than an order of
reading thing. When I sort my ToDo list I put the things most important
on top, when I sort my mail, I put the things I need to read on top,
etc. This way the most important piece (the newest comment in this
case) is on top and I don't have to go digging for it.
Not everyone puts inline responses and they're not always needed. If
you place some a good idea is one a co-worker uses:
See inline comments below.
4 works, 1 line. Tells us there is content he added mixed in.
Otherwise I don't have to waste time and effort digging through the
rants, flames and fluff wondering "is there something down here?"...
:wq!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert L. Harris | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
@ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
DISCLAIMER:
These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else.
Diagnosis: witzelsucht
IPv6 = robert@ipv6.rdlg.net http://ipv6.rdlg.net
IPv4 = robert@mail.rdlg.net http://www.rdlg.net
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-24 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-23 20:18 2.6.0-test1-ac3 still broken on Adaptec I2O Robert L. Harris
2003-07-23 20:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-07-23 22:00 ` Robert L. Harris
2003-07-23 22:53 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-07-23 23:32 ` Posting format bill davidsen
2003-07-24 0:52 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-07-24 15:14 ` Steven Cole
2003-07-24 15:47 ` Robert L. Harris
2003-07-24 16:03 ` Tomas Szepe
2003-07-24 16:52 ` Steven Cole
2003-07-24 17:15 ` Robert L. Harris [this message]
2003-07-24 17:42 ` Steven Cole
2003-07-24 16:03 ` Bas Mevissen
2003-07-24 16:05 ` Steven Cole
2003-07-24 23:15 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-07-24 23:24 ` CaT
2003-07-25 2:59 ` jw schultz
2003-07-25 3:33 ` Miles Bader
2003-07-24 15:24 ` [OT] " Sean Neakums
2003-07-23 20:24 ` 2.6.0-test1-ac3 still broken on Adaptec I2O Alan Cox
2003-07-23 21:20 ` Samuel Flory
2003-07-23 22:17 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-24 8:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-07-24 11:24 ` Alan Cox
2003-07-24 17:37 Posting format Mudama, Eric
2003-07-24 18:57 John Bradford
2003-07-25 18:49 ` Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra
2003-07-25 20:35 John Bradford
2003-07-25 22:10 ` jw schultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030724171553.GK32585@rdlg.net \
--to=robert.l.harris@rdlg.net \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=elenstev@mesatop.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=szepe@pinerecords.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®