From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270655AbTG0C4f (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Jul 2003 22:56:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270656AbTG0C4e (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Jul 2003 22:56:34 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:40404 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270655AbTG0C4d (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Jul 2003 22:56:33 -0400 Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 20:09:03 -0700 From: "Randy.Dunlap" To: Tomas Szepe Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [TRIVIAL] kill annoying submenus in fs/Kconfig Message-Id: <20030726200903.73d17418.rddunlap@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20030726195544.GA16160@louise.pinerecords.com> References: <20030726195544.GA16160@louise.pinerecords.com> Organization: OSDL X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.11 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) X-Face: +5V?h'hZQPB9kW Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 21:55:44 +0200 Tomas Szepe wrote: | Patch against -bk3. | | -- Let me begin by saying that I find the menu arrangement (both before and after this patch) highly subjective. I.e., there's not necessarily a right or wrong. (RR:) I.e., in the absence of further input, some maintainer can decide. :) Given the above: I prefer short menus. I find them more readable, with less clutter. So I don't mind them the way that they currently are. OTOH, I don't care strongly either way. I think that we should care more about how non-developers use and see 'make *config' than how kernel developers use and see it. -- ~Randy | http://developer.osdl.org/rddunlap/ | http://www.xenotime.net/linux/ | For Linux-2.6: http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/post-halloween-2.5.txt or http://lwn.net/Articles/39901/ http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/modules/