From: Matthew Dharm <mdharm-kernel@one-eyed-alien.net>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
Cc: USB Developers <linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Kernel Developer List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] System stalls using usb-storage
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 23:35:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030726233545.B20751@one-eyed-alien.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200307270824.44851.oliver@neukum.org>; from oliver@neukum.org on Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 08:24:44AM +0200
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1294 bytes --]
On Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 08:24:44AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2003 05:00 schrieb Matthew Dharm:
> > Many people, including myself, have observed system stalls when using
> > usb-storage. It happens when copying large amounts of data to a USB device
> > -- everything (except the USB access) just stops for a little while. My
> > best guess is that the block cache is filling up (easy since USB is so
> > slow).
>
> Can you do a vmstat run? That should provide conclusive data.
> If so, write throteling is failing.
I'll set up some tests and get back to you...
> > The question is, what is the best way to handle this. I'm guessing that
> > increasing the priority of the usb-storage control thread will help, but
> > that's just a guess. I'm not even sure how to go about doing that, tho...
>
> A kernel thread in the block io path has to have a higher priority than
> any user task. Otherwise a priority inversion is possible.
Reasonable. So, other than renice at the command line, how does one go
about setting this?
Matt
--
Matthew Dharm Home: mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net
Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver
Somebody call an exorcist!
-- Dust Puppy
User Friendly, 5/16/1998
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-27 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-24 3:00 Matthew Dharm
2003-07-27 6:24 ` [linux-usb-devel] " Oliver Neukum
2003-07-27 6:35 ` Matthew Dharm [this message]
2003-07-27 9:09 ` Peter Osterlund
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030726233545.B20751@one-eyed-alien.net \
--to=mdharm-kernel@one-eyed-alien.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®