From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270652AbTG0Cli (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Jul 2003 22:41:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270654AbTG0Cli (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Jul 2003 22:41:38 -0400 Received: from louise.pinerecords.com ([213.168.176.16]:59356 "EHLO louise.pinerecords.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270652AbTG0Clh (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Jul 2003 22:41:37 -0400 Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 04:56:47 +0200 From: Tomas Szepe To: "Randy.Dunlap" Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus Message-ID: <20030727025647.GB17724@louise.pinerecords.com> References: <20030726200213.GD16160@louise.pinerecords.com> <20030726194651.5e3f00bb.rddunlap@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030726194651.5e3f00bb.rddunlap@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > [rddunlap@osdl.org] > > 1. However, both old and new versions say: > Power management options (ACPI, APM) ---> > but have Software Suspend and CPU Frequency (hidden) below there, > so one has to know to look there for them, while the heading > only says APCI and APM. I guess that the heading is too restrictive. Yes, you're right, let's just kill the parentheses. > 2. APM and ACPI aren't usable together, right? so should the > Kconfig file prevent both of them from being enabled? I'm not quite sure about this, though I believe that ACPI at least in the CPU-enum-only configuration makes sense even with APM enabled. > 3. The help text for Software Suspend (not part of this patch) > really needs some help. Would you address that or shall I? Sure, it would be nice if you could fish out an entry from somewhere. -- Tomas Szepe