Re: 2.6-test2: gcc-3.3.1 warning.

["Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>]

On 29 Jul 2003 12:57:52 +0100 Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:

| On Maw, 2003-07-29 at 11:20, Tomas Szepe wrote:
| > > What is the difference between backporting a patch from 3.3.1-pre to 3.3,
| > > and using 3.3.1-pre directly ? Ah, that you get less bug corrected.
| > 
| > Large.  3.3 is a development series.  It DOES introduce new stuff.
| > 
| > In production environments you definitely want to stick with 3.2.3
| > or (better yet) 2.95.3.
| 
| 3.2 is probably the best, but lots of people are using gcc 3.3 to build
| kernels and so far all the things we've hit have been the stricter
| parser throwing up on technically invalid C in the kernel source/

I really hate to get this back to the original problem, but is
the reported warning a gcc 3.3.x problem?  I don't see the assembly
problem here.

| arch/i386/kernel/reboot.c: In function `machine_restart':
| arch/i386/kernel/reboot.c:261: warning: use of memory input without
| lvalue in asm operand 0 is deprecated

--
~Randy