Re: ROOT NFS fixes ...

["Herbert Pötzl" <herbert@13thfloor.at>]

On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 11:28:46AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Herbert Pötzl wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:57:52AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Herbert Pötzl wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Marcelo!
> > > > >
> > > > > just verified that the NFS root bug-fix was not
> > > > > included in 2.4.22-pre9, unfortunately I have
> > > > > to ask you again, why you do not want to fix
> > > > > this issue in 2.4.22 ...
> > > > >
> > > > > I do not understand why Trond obviously is
> > > > > ignoring my mails, regarding this particular
> > > > > issue, maybe he is just too busy to look at
> > > > > four twoline changes, and more, I do not
> > > > > understand why this isn't accepted into the
> > > > > marcelo kernel tree, as it obviously fixes a
> > > > > misbehaviour?
> > > > >
> > > > > please explain!
> > > > >
> > > > > It is okay for me, if your argumentation goes
> > > > > like "I don't like you, that's reason enough
> > > > > for me to not include your patches ...", but I
> > > > > would like to know ...
> > > >
> > > > I do not consider the patch critical enough.
> > > >
> > > > Get it in 2.5 first, then come back :)
> > >
> > > I hope this is a joke, and you are still reading
> > > your mail ...
> >
> > No, this is not a joke, at all.
> >
> > Let me repeat: I (and Trond) do not consider this patch critical.
> 
> Ok, I'm wrong. I just read Trond's mail saying the patch is OK.
> 
> I'll apply it to -pre10.

hmm, maybe it _is_ too early to do this ;)
but on the other hand, I'm a fearless creature ...

many thanks,
Herbert