mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FS: hardlinks on directories
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 22:03:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030804200351.GA24036@dspnet.fr.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030804165002.791aae3d.skraw@ithnet.com>

On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:50:02PM +0200, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 15:04:28 +0100 (BST)
> Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> > You ask for examples of applications?  There are millions!  Anything that
> > walks the directory tree for a start, e.g. ls -R, find, locatedb, medusa,
> > du, any type of search and/or indexing engine, chown -R, cp -R, scp
> > -R, chmod -R, etc...
> 
> There is a flaw in this argument. If I am told that mount --bind does just
> about what I want to have as a feature then these applictions must have the
> same problems already (if I mount braindead). So an implementation in fs cannot
> do any _additional_ damage to these applications, or not?

There is a subtle but fundamental difference between mount --bind and
hard links for directories[1]: mounts done under a bind point and
mounts done under the original tree are independant.  An example on a
system (rh9) with the "standard" /dev/pts mounted and no devfs:

root@zalem:~ #1 >mkdir x
root@zalem:~ #2 >mount --bind /dev x
root@zalem:~ #3 >ls -l /dev |head -5
total 305
crw-------    1 root     root      10,  10 Jan 30  2003 adbmouse
crw-r--r--    1 root     root      10, 175 Jan 30  2003 agpgart
crw-------    1 root     root      10,   4 Jan 30  2003 amigamouse
crw-------    1 root     root      10,   7 Jan 30  2003 amigamouse1
root@zalem:~ #4 >ls -l x | head -5
total 306
crw-------    1 root     root      10,  10 Jan 30  2003 adbmouse
crw-r--r--    1 root     root      10, 175 Jan 30  2003 agpgart
crw-------    1 root     root      10,   4 Jan 30  2003 amigamouse
crw-------    1 root     root      10,   7 Jan 30  2003 amigamouse1
root@zalem:~ #5 >ls -l x/pts |head -5
total 0
root@zalem:~ #6 >ls -l /dev/pts | head -5
total 0
crw--w----    1 galibert tty      136,   0 Aug  4 21:56 0
crw--w----    1 galibert tty      136,   1 Aug  4 21:56 1
crw--w----    1 galibert tty      136,   2 Aug  4 21:57 2
root@zalem:~ #7 >mount --bind /tmp x/input
root@zalem:~ #8 >ls -l x/input | head -5
total 25
-rw-r--r--    1 galibert mame            0 Aug  1 23:24 Acrodqnzpn
drwx------    2 galibert mame           48 Jul 31 22:52 galibert
drwx------    2 galibert mame           72 Aug  1 22:17 gsrvdir500
srwxrwxrwx    1 wnn      wnn             0 Aug  4 21:11 jd_sockV4
root@zalem:~ #9 >ls -l /dev/input | head -5
total 0
crw-------    1 root     root      13,  64 Jan 30  2003 event0
crw-------    1 root     root      13,  65 Jan 30  2003 event1
crw-------    1 root     root      13,  74 Jan 30  2003 event10
crw-------    1 root     root      13,  75 Jan 30  2003 event11

You can see that ~root/x and /dev are the same file tree but different
mount spaces.  Because of that you can't have a loop, because a bind
mount can't point to a mount space that is a predecessor of itself.

  OG.

[1] You can mount --bind files.

  reply	other threads:[~2003-08-04 20:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-04 12:15 Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 12:45 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-08-04 13:22   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 13:37     ` Christian Reichert
2003-08-04 13:44       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 14:22         ` Christian Reichert
2003-08-04 15:31     ` Jeff Muizelaar
2003-08-04 16:15       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05  2:45         ` Neil Brown
2003-08-05  9:41           ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-06  1:12             ` Neil Brown
2003-08-06 10:14               ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-07  2:27                 ` Neil Brown
2003-08-04 12:47 ` Nikita Danilov
2003-08-04 13:32   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 13:44 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-08-04 13:56   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 14:04     ` Anton Altaparmakov
2003-08-04 14:50       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 20:03         ` Olivier Galibert [this message]
2003-08-04 21:16         ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-04 23:34           ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 14:20             ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-05 14:44               ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 22:58         ` Andrew Pimlott
2003-08-05  0:19           ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05  1:18             ` Andrew Pimlott
2003-08-05  8:04               ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 11:18                 ` Wakko Warner
2003-08-04 14:33     ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-04 15:05       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 15:57         ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-08-04 21:23           ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-04 16:11         ` Adam Sampson
2003-08-04 17:00         ` Hans Reiser
2003-08-04 17:18           ` Sean Neakums
2003-08-05  4:53           ` jw schultz
2003-08-04 18:50         ` jlnance
2003-08-04 21:09         ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-04 22:13           ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 22:32           ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 23:00             ` Randolph Bentson
2003-08-05  0:10               ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05  2:09                 ` Edgar Toernig
2003-08-05  8:05                   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 12:51             ` Helge Hafting
2003-08-05 13:03               ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 13:13                 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2003-08-05 13:39                   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 13:36                 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-08-05 14:04                   ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 14:57                     ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-08-05 15:08                       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 15:02                     ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-05 15:12                       ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 15:44                       ` Trond Myklebust
2003-08-05 14:56                   ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-05 22:08                 ` Helge Hafting
2003-08-24 17:35                   ` Hans Reiser
2003-08-24 19:02                     ` Helge Hafting
2003-08-25  8:27                     ` Nikita Danilov
2003-08-25 15:48                       ` Hans Reiser
2003-08-05 14:12             ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-05 14:21               ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 15:53                 ` Herbert Pötzl
2003-08-04 20:47     ` Jan Harkes
2003-08-04 15:42   ` Brian Pawlowski
2003-08-04 15:56     ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 16:16       ` Herbert Pötzl
2003-08-04 16:35         ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 16:54           ` Herbert Pötzl
2003-08-04 17:18             ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-04 17:25               ` Herbert Pötzl
2003-08-04 21:38           ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-05  0:06             ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05  3:11           ` Neil Brown
2003-08-04 21:29       ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-04 23:42         ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-08-05 16:46           ` viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030804200351.GA24036@dspnet.fr.eu.org \
    --to=galibert@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome