From: Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
Cc: Erik Andersen <andersen@codepoet.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ide-disk.c rev 1.13 killed CONFIG_IDEDISK_STROKE
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 03:11:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030807011146.GB5454@win.tue.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.4.30.0308062024180.10247-300000@mion.elka.pw.edu.pl>
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 08:32:23PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> diff -puN drivers/ide/ide-disk.c~ide-disk-capacity-init-cleanup drivers/ide/ide-disk.c
> --- linux-2.6.0-test2-bk5/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c~ide-disk-capacity-init-cleanup 2003-08-06 02:48:33.000000000 +0200
Ha - and you didnt even tell me you had this patch out.
Looks good.
You forgot to correct the do_div.
The part I most object to are things like
> + id->lba_capacity_2 = capacity_2 = set_max_ext;
There have been many problems in the past, and it is a bad idea to add
more of this. We should be eliminating all cases.
I mean:
We have info from BIOS, user, disk etc and conclude to a certain geometry.
Sneakily changing what the disk reported is very ugly. I recall a case
where a disk bounced between two capacities because the value that this
computation concluded to was not a fixed point. Also, the user gets an
incorrect report from HDIO_GET_IDENTITY.
So, the clean way is to examine what the disk reported, never change it
(except for the part
--------------------------------------------------------------
void ide_fix_driveid (struct hd_driveid *id)
{
#ifndef __LITTLE_ENDIAN
# ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN
int i;
u16 *shortcast;
shortcast = (u16 *) id;
for (i = 0; i < (sizeof(struct hd_driveid) / 2); i++)
shortcast[i] = __le16_to_cpu(shortcast[i]);
# else
# error "Please fix <asm/byteorder.h>"
# endif
#endif
}
--------------------------------------------------------------
that brings shorts into CPU order)
and store the results elsewhere. In particular, our conclusions
should go into drive->capacity and should not overwrite
id->lba_capacity.
Andries
[will try to find the appropriate fragment of my patch again
for comparison purposes]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-07 1:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20030806181142.GD25910@codepoet.org>
2003-08-06 18:32 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-08-06 19:30 ` Erik Andersen
2003-08-06 19:58 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-08-07 1:11 ` Andries Brouwer [this message]
2003-08-07 2:31 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-08-07 13:22 Andries.Brouwer
2003-08-07 13:50 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-07 11:23 Andries.Brouwer
2003-08-07 11:49 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-08-07 9:57 Andries.Brouwer
2003-08-07 10:44 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-08-07 1:59 Andries.Brouwer
2003-08-02 12:45 Andries Brouwer
2003-08-02 13:10 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-08-02 17:42 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-08-02 21:06 ` Alan Cox
2003-08-02 23:34 ` [PATCH] " Erik Andersen
2003-08-03 1:26 ` Andries Brouwer
2003-08-03 2:12 ` Erik Andersen
2003-08-03 9:52 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030807011146.GB5454@win.tue.nl \
--to=aebr@win.tue.nl \
--cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=andersen@codepoet.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®