From: long <tlnguyen@snoqualmie.dp.intel.com>
To: greg@kroah.com, zwane@linuxpower.ca
Cc: jun.nakajima@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pcihpd-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net,
tlnguyen@snoqualmie.dp.intel.com, tom.l.nguyen@intel.com
Subject: Re: Updated MSI Patches
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 08:22:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200308121522.h7CFMtc4003862@snoqualmie.dp.intel.com> (raw)
> > > I hope there may be a way to determine the number of vectors supported
> > > by CPU during the run-time. I look at the file ../include/asm-i386/mach-
> > > default/irq_vectors.h, the maximum of vectors (256) is already well
> > > commented.
> >
> > Yeah, but that's in reference to APIC interrupt sources, right? Does
> > that correspond to these "vectors" too? If so, why not just use the
> > existing NR_IRQS value instead of creating your own?
>
> There isn't a 1:1 relationship between NR_IRQS and NR_VECTORS we really
> shouldn't mix them together. NR_IRQS can be much higher than 256 whilst
> on i386 we're fixed to 256 vectors due to that being the Interrupt
> Descriptor Table capacity. It is still possible to service more interrupt
> lines than 256 on SMP however by making IDTs per 'interrupt servicing
> node'
> Ah, so for processors other than i386, NR_VECTORS can be bigger?
> I think a nice description is still needed for this value for just this
> reason :)
Agree. Will put some comments describing this value.
Thanks,
Long
next reply other threads:[~2003-08-12 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-12 15:22 long [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-03 22:15 long
2003-10-01 18:26 Nguyen, Tom L
2003-10-01 15:37 long
2003-10-01 17:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-22 18:25 long
2003-08-19 15:42 Nguyen, Tom L
2003-08-14 23:46 Nguyen, Tom L
2003-08-13 15:19 Nguyen, Tom L
2003-08-13 4:14 Nakajima, Jun
2003-08-13 1:34 Nakajima, Jun
2003-08-13 1:37 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-08-12 23:59 Nakajima, Jun
2003-08-13 0:48 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-08-12 18:36 Nakajima, Jun
2003-08-12 18:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-12 19:14 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-08-12 19:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-12 17:32 Nguyen, Tom L
2003-08-12 18:14 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-08-12 17:04 Nguyen, Tom L
2003-08-12 18:11 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-08-11 20:51 long
2003-08-11 21:16 ` Greg KH
2003-08-12 1:41 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2003-08-12 5:53 ` Greg KH
2003-08-08 19:33 long
2003-08-08 20:15 ` Greg KH
2003-08-08 14:41 Nguyen, Tom L
2003-08-07 23:07 Nakajima, Jun
2003-08-07 21:25 long
2003-08-07 22:14 ` Greg KH
2003-08-07 22:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-08-07 23:03 ` Matt Porter
2003-08-08 2:36 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200308121522.h7CFMtc4003862@snoqualmie.dp.intel.com \
--to=tlnguyen@snoqualmie.dp.intel.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pcihpd-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=tom.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=zwane@linuxpower.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®