From: Cliff White <cliffw@osdl.org>
To: linstab@osdl.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: [osdl-aim-7] 2.6.0-test4, -test4-mm1
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 14:27:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200308262127.h7QLRsg08273@mail.osdl.org> (raw)
All results: http://developer.osdl.org/cliffw/reaim/index.html
I am now running two workloads, new_dbase and compute:
The compute workload has much less IO, more system time.
On the 1 and 2 cpu machines, very little delta, test4 a little better:
1-CPU
STP id PLM# Kernel Name Workfile MaxJPM MaxUser Host Change
278204 2070 2.6.0-test4-mm1 new_dbase 988.42 17 stp1-001 0.00
278000 2067 linux-2.6.0-test4 new_dbase 990.15 17 stp1-003 0.18
278205 2070 2.6.0-test4-mm1 compute 1011.76 17 stp1-003 0.00
278001 2067 linux-2.6.0-test4 compute 1019.36 17 stp1-000 0.75
2-CPU
278215 2070 2.6.0-test4-mm1 new_dbase 1325.86 22 stp2-000 0.00
278011 2067 linux-2.6.0-test4 new_dbase 1331.56 24 stp2-000 0.43
278216 2070 2.6.0-test4-mm1 compute 1511.41 26 stp2-001 0.00
278012 2067 linux-2.6.0-test4 compute 1535.87 26 stp2-001 1.62
Running on the 8-cpu machines, delta is larger:
STP id PLM# Kernel Name Workfile MaxJPM MaxUser Host Change
278184 2070 2.6.0-test4-mm1 new_dbase 8203.60 136 stp8-001 0.00
277980 2067 linux-2.6.0-test4 new_dbase 8483.27 144 stp8-002 3.41
278186 2070 2.6.0-test4-mm1 compute 9601.96 160 stp8-003 0.00
277982 2067 linux-2.6.0-test4 compute 9432.60 160 stp8-000 -1.76
---------------
Detail on any run:
http://khack.osdl.org/stp/<STP id>
Hardware details:
http://khack.osdl.org/stp/<STP id>/environment/machine_info
More results:
http://developer.osdl.org/cliffw/reaim/index.html
---------------
Code location:
bk://developer.osdl.org/osdl-aim-7
tarball:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/re-aim-7
Run parameters:
./reaim -s$CPU_COUNT -x -t -i$CPU_COUNT -f workfile.new_dbase -r3 -b
-l./stp.config
./reaim -s$CPU_COUNT -q -t -i$CPU_COUNT -f workfile.new_dbase -r3 -b
-l./stp.config
(3 runs each, average of all 6 reported runs repeated with workfile.compute)
cliffw
reply other threads:[~2003-08-26 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200308262127.h7QLRsg08273@mail.osdl.org \
--to=cliffw@osdl.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linstab@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®