mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Rankin <cj.rankin@ntlworld.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Looking for tunable hardware parameters in 2.4.22
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 00:13:20 +0100 (BST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200308262313.h7QNDKIu007249@twopit.underworld> (raw)

Hi,

This could well be a motherboard problem, but the motherboard support
person has given up and all BIOS development has long since
stopped. So I'm wondering if just *maybe* there's a magic parameter I
could try tweaking on the Linux command line, please? I've already
tried "noapic", "acpi=off" and "nosmp".

Background:
- a dual PIII Coppermine board, i840 chipset, 133 MHz FSB
- 1GB of P100 memory
- CPUs are identical, and rated at 933 MHz on a 133 MHz FSB

This board has suddenly become unstable when there is a CPU in what
the motherboard calls "slot 2" and when the FSB is 133 MHz. The
motherboard is fine when either:
a) both CPUs are installed, and the FSB is set to 100 MHz, or
b) the CPU is removed from slot 2 and the FSB is set to 133 MHz.

I've swapped the CPUs around and tried replacing them entirely to no
avail, and so I know these CPUs are OK. I've also run memtest 3.0 over
the memory for almost 6 hours (with FSB=133 MHz; 3 times through the
entire RAM) with no problems, so I'm sure the RAM is OK too. However,
the support person thought that the problem was a mis-timing between
the FSB and the memory bus. (This board's memory bus runs at 100 MHz,
of course.)

The fact that the board runs OK with the underclocked FSB gives me
hope that the board hasn't burnt out or anything, because surely such
a catastrophic failure would have rendered it completely useless?

Unfortunately, the only timing the BIOS lets me change is the PCI
latency, which is currently set to 64. Would it be wise to adjust this
to (say) 96? I really don't want to risk damaging anything via a
"randomly tweaking monkey" approach.

Any advice appreciated, even if it's just "Give up, you have tried
everything."

Thanks in advance,
Chris



             reply	other threads:[~2003-08-26 23:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-26 23:13 Chris Rankin [this message]
2003-08-28 15:46 ` David Zaffiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200308262313.h7QNDKIu007249@twopit.underworld \
    --to=cj.rankin@ntlworld.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®