mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
To: wa@almesberger.net (Werner Almesberger)
Cc: quade@hsnr.de, nagendra_tomar@adaptec.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tasklet_kill will always hang for recursive tasklets on a UP
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2003 05:47:18 +0400 (MSD)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200308270147.FAA07024@dub.inr.ac.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030826145636.E1212@almesberger.net> from "Werner Almesberger" at  =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=20=E1?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D7=C7?= 26, 2003 02:56:36

Hello!

> Hmm, actually, no. On UP, yes. But on SMP, you might tasklet_kill
> while the tasklet is running, but before it has had a chance to
> tasklet_schedule itself. tasklet_schedule will have no effect in
> this case.
> 
> Alexey, if my observation is correct, the property
> 
> | * If tasklet_schedule() is called, then tasklet is guaranteed
> |   to be executed on some cpu at least once after this.
> 
> does not hold if using tasklet_kill on SMP.

It still holds. tasklet_kill just waits for completion of scheduled
events. Well, it _assumes_ that cpu which calls tasklet_schedule
does not try to wake the tasklet after death. But it is from area
of pure scholastics already: waker and killer have to synchronize in some
way anyway. 

Alexey

  reply	other threads:[~2003-08-27  1:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-25  0:00 Nagendra Singh Tomar
2003-08-25  1:53 ` Nagendra Singh Tomar
2003-08-25 14:11 ` Juergen Quade
2003-08-25 17:14   ` Nagendra Singh Tomar
2003-08-27 18:21     ` Juergen Quade
2003-08-27 17:46       ` Nagendra Singh Tomar
2003-08-28 15:29         ` Juergen Quade
2003-08-28 15:53           ` kuznet
2003-08-28 16:17             ` Juergen Quade
2003-08-29  2:22               ` Werner Almesberger
2003-08-26  5:48 ` Werner Almesberger
2003-08-25 18:45   ` Nagendra Singh Tomar
2003-08-26  7:38     ` Werner Almesberger
2003-08-26  8:32       ` Juergen Quade
2003-08-26 17:56         ` Werner Almesberger
2003-08-27  1:47           ` kuznet [this message]
2003-08-26 16:17             ` Nagendra Singh Tomar
2003-08-28 13:17               ` kuznet
2003-08-28 16:25                 ` Nagendra Singh Tomar
2003-09-04 13:25                   ` kuznet
2003-08-29  2:30             ` Werner Almesberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200308270147.FAA07024@dub.inr.ac.ru \
    --to=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nagendra_tomar@adaptec.com \
    --cc=quade@hsnr.de \
    --cc=wa@almesberger.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®