mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zboszor@freemail.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test4-mm3
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 08:35:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030829083540.58c9dd47.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F4F22D3.9080104@freemail.hu>

Boszormenyi Zoltan <zboszor@freemail.hu> wrote:
>
> I tried to "make modules_install" on the compiled tree.
> It says:
> 
> # make modules_install
> Install a current version of module-init-tools
> See http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/post-halloween-2.5.txt
> make: *** [_modinst_] Error 1
> 
> But I have installed it! It's called modutils-2.4.25-8
> (was -5 previously) from RH rawhide, it works on older
> (2.6.0-test4-mm1) kernels.
> This modutils is united with module-init-tools-0.9.12,
> it reports version 2.4.25 but detects newer kernels and uses
> the new module interface.

Tricky.

It's wrong of the Red Hat package to misidentify itself in this manner.

It would sort-of make sense for `depmod -V' to autodetect the kernel
version and print either "modutils" or "module-init-utils".  But that's not
accurate either: a `make modules_install' would fail when performed under a
2.4 kernel.

So yes, I think that your patch to RH modutils+module-init-tools is the best
approach: after all, it tells the truth.

Meanwhile, I'll alter Valdis's patch so that it warns, but does not fail
the make.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-08-29 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-29  9:54 2.6.0-test4-mm3 Boszormenyi Zoltan
2003-08-29 12:52 ` 2.6.0-test4-mm3 Bas Mevissen
2003-08-29 13:00 ` 2.6.0-test4-mm3 Valdis.Kletnieks
     [not found]   ` <1062168946.19599.114.camel@workshop.saharacpt.lan>
2003-08-30  7:35     ` 2.6.0-test4-mm3 Martin Schlemmer
     [not found]     ` <200308291553.h7TFrcGG009390@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
2003-09-01 20:23       ` 2.6.0-test4-mm3 Martin Schlemmer
2003-09-01 20:34         ` 2.6.0-test4-mm3 Sam Ravnborg
2003-09-01 23:52         ` 2.6.0-test4-mm3 Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-09-02  4:14           ` 2.6.0-test4-mm3 Martin Schlemmer
2003-09-02 14:31             ` 2.6.0-test4-mm3 Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-08-29 15:35 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2003-08-29 16:22   ` 2.6.0-test4-mm3 Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-08-29 16:27   ` 2.6.0-test4-mm3 Cliff White
2003-08-29 16:34     ` 2.6.0-test4-mm3 Andrew Morton
2003-08-30  6:16     ` 2.6.0-test4-mm3 Martin Schlemmer
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-29  6:56 2.6.0-test4-mm3 Andrew Morton
2003-08-29  7:45 ` 2.6.0-test4-mm3 Andrew Morton
2003-08-29 15:42 ` 2.6.0-test4-mm3 Ed Sweetman
2003-08-29 15:57   ` 2.6.0-test4-mm3 Andrew Morton
2003-08-29 15:59   ` 2.6.0-test4-mm3 Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-09-10 18:53 ` 2.6.0-test4-mm3 Mike Fedyk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030829083540.58c9dd47.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zboszor@freemail.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome