From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>,
rmk@arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Fix up power managment in 2.6
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 10:17:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030902171729.GB17807@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030901224018.GA470@elf.ucw.cz>
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:40:18AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > I don't think PCI device support broke - Pat seems to have fixed up
> > all that fairly nicely, so the driver model change should be
> > transparent.
>
> As far as I can test, yes, at least UHCI looks broken :-(. It is true
> that calling convention at PCI level did not change.
UHCI is broken? How?
Hey, I don't think that the USB code will work at all with suspend
without just unloading the whole USB core.
But I now have some patches in my tree that hook up the usb tree with
the power model to allow usb drivers to be notified that they should
save state in order to try to work on fixing this "problem".
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 12:40:18AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > I don't think PCI device support broke - Pat seems to have fixed up
> > all that fairly nicely, so the driver model change should be
> > transparent.
>
> As far as I can test, yes, at least UHCI looks broken :-(. It is true
> that calling convention at PCI level did not change.
UHCI is broken? How?
Hey, I don't think that the USB code will work at all with suspend
without just unloading the whole USB core.
But I now have some patches in my tree that hook up the usb tree with
the power model to allow usb drivers to be notified that they should
save state in order to try to work on fixing this "problem".
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-02 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-31 23:28 Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 6:57 ` Russell King
2003-09-01 8:11 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 8:26 ` Russell King
2003-09-01 9:33 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 16:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-09-01 21:12 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 21:52 ` Russell King
2003-09-01 22:19 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 22:30 ` Russell King
2003-09-01 22:40 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 22:48 ` Russell King
2003-09-02 17:17 ` Greg KH [this message]
2003-09-03 15:13 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-02 10:21 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-09-03 13:02 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-03 13:31 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-09-03 17:08 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 20:42 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-01 22:55 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-01 23:38 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-02 0:52 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-02 9:02 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-02 9:47 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-02 16:11 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-03 16:21 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-03 23:17 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-03 17:49 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-03 17:59 ` bill davidsen
2003-09-03 23:20 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-05 9:33 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-03 20:03 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-09-03 22:14 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-04 4:06 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-09-04 14:52 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-02 10:29 ` Jan Rychter
2003-09-05 5:58 ` Rob Landley
2003-09-05 10:26 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 10:56 ` Michael Frank
2003-09-05 11:08 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 11:51 ` Michael Frank
2003-09-05 12:01 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 17:47 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-05 18:02 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-05 18:13 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-05 21:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-05 18:57 ` Rob Landley
2003-09-05 19:06 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 20:09 ` Keyboard stuff (was Re: Fix up power managment in 2.6) Rob Landley
2003-09-05 20:31 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 20:01 ` Fix up power managment in 2.6 Richard A Nelson
2003-09-05 21:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-05 18:49 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-05 20:13 Nicolas Mailhot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030902171729.GB17807@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mochel@osdl.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®