mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Huh <tejun@aratech.co.kr>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl
Subject: [PATCH] ide task_map_rq() preempt count imbalance
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 14:52:57 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030903055257.GA31635@atj.dyndns.org> (raw)

 Hello,

 2.5 kernel continued to fail on my test machine with a lot of
scheduling while atomic messages.  The offending function was
include/linux/ide.h:task_sectors() which calls task_map_rq() followed
by process_that_request_first(), taskfile_{input|output}_data() and
task_unmap_rq().

static inline void *task_map_rq(struct request *rq, unsigned long *flags)
{
	/*
	 * fs request
	 */
	if (rq->cbio)
		return rq_map_buffer(rq, flags);

	/*
	 * task request
	 */
	return rq->buffer + blk_rq_offset(rq);
}

static inline void task_unmap_rq(struct request *rq, char *buffer, unsigned long *flags)
{
	if (rq->cbio)
		rq_unmap_buffer(buffer, flags);
}

 rq_[un]map_buffer() eventually call into k[un]map_atomic() which
adjust preempt_count().  The problem is that rq->cbio is cleared by
process_that_request_first() before calling task_unmap_rq(), so the
preempt_count() isn't decremented properly.

 As it seems that rq->cbio test is to avoid the cost of calling into
k[un]map_atomic, I just removed the optimization and it worked for me.

 I'm not familiar with ide and block layer.  If I got something wrong,
please point out.

-- 
tejun

# This is a BitKeeper generated patch for the following project:
# Project Name: Linux kernel tree
# This patch format is intended for GNU patch command version 2.5 or higher.
# This patch includes the following deltas:
#	           ChangeSet	1.1412  -> 1.1413 
#	 include/linux/ide.h	1.72    -> 1.73   
#
# The following is the BitKeeper ChangeSet Log
# --------------------------------------------
# 03/09/03	tj@atj.dyndns.org	1.1413
# - task_[un]map_rq() preempt count imbalance fixed.
# --------------------------------------------
#
diff -Nru a/include/linux/ide.h b/include/linux/ide.h
--- a/include/linux/ide.h	Wed Sep  3 14:50:20 2003
+++ b/include/linux/ide.h	Wed Sep  3 14:50:20 2003
@@ -853,22 +853,12 @@
 
 static inline void *task_map_rq(struct request *rq, unsigned long *flags)
 {
-	/*
-	 * fs request
-	 */
-	if (rq->cbio)
-		return rq_map_buffer(rq, flags);
-
-	/*
-	 * task request
-	 */
-	return rq->buffer + blk_rq_offset(rq);
+	return rq_map_buffer(rq, flags);
 }
 
 static inline void task_unmap_rq(struct request *rq, char *buffer, unsigned long *flags)
 {
-	if (rq->cbio)
-		rq_unmap_buffer(buffer, flags);
+	rq_unmap_buffer(buffer, flags);
 }
 
 #endif /* !CONFIG_IDE_TASKFILE_IO */

             reply	other threads:[~2003-09-03  5:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-03  5:52 Tejun Huh [this message]
2003-09-03  6:40 ` Jens Axboe
2003-09-03  7:00   ` Tejun Huh
2003-09-03 15:53 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-09-06  2:18   ` Tejun Huh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030903055257.GA31635@atj.dyndns.org \
    --to=tejun@aratech.co.kr \
    --cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®