From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265760AbTIERc1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2003 13:32:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265762AbTIERc1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2003 13:32:27 -0400 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:9664 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265760AbTIERc0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Sep 2003 13:32:26 -0400 Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 10:14:24 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: "Nakajima, Jun" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sunil.saxena@intel.com, asit.k.mallick@intel.com, venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] idle using PNI monitor/mwait (take 2) Message-Id: <20030905101424.59fa1fc7.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <7F740D512C7C1046AB53446D3720017304A727@scsmsx402.sc.intel.com> References: <7F740D512C7C1046AB53446D3720017304A727@scsmsx402.sc.intel.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Nakajima, Jun" wrote: > > Attached is a patch that enables PNI (Prescott New Instructions) > monitor/mwait in the kernel idle. Thanks, looks good. Why is there a local_irq_enable() on entry to mwait_idle()?