From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: Andrew de Quincey <adq_dvb@lidskialf.net>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
torvalds@osdl.org, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-acpi@intel.com
Subject: Re: [ACPI] Re: [PATCH] Next round of ACPI IRQ fixes (VIA ACPI fixed)
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 17:02:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030905170224.A16217@osdlab.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200309060016.16545.adq_dvb@lidskialf.net>; from adq_dvb@lidskialf.net on Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 12:16:15AM +0100
* Andrew de Quincey (adq_dvb@lidskialf.net) wrote:
> On Friday 05 Sep 2003 10:35 pm, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > This is why we _really_ need you to split up your patches. Multiple
> > split-up patches, one per email, is preferred. Don't worry about
> > sending us too much email: we like it like that.
>
> If/when I split it up, is it acceptable to number the patches to give the
> order they have to be applied in? The major problem with these particular
> fixes is that they all run over the same set of files, even the same
> functions, so they all conflict with each other.
Yes, please split them up.
I finally narrowed down to the ChangeSet 1.1046.1.424 (ACPI: Allow irqs >
15...) as cause to my current hang-on-boot problem. Quick test to see
if this patch fixes...nope ;-(
thanks,
-chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-06 0:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-05 18:58 Andrew de Quincey
2003-09-05 21:35 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-05 23:16 ` [ACPI] " Andrew de Quincey
2003-09-05 22:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-05 22:28 ` Andrew Morton
2003-09-05 22:56 ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-09-06 0:15 ` [PATCH] 2.4.23-pre3 ACPI fixes series (1/3) Andrew de Quincey
2003-09-10 11:45 ` Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
2003-09-10 21:27 ` Andrew de Quincey
2003-09-10 15:31 ` Daniel Egger
2003-09-06 0:15 ` [PATCH] 2.4.23-pre3 ACPI fixes series (2/3) Andrew de Quincey
2003-09-06 0:15 ` [PATCH] 2.4.23-pre3 ACPI fixes series (3/3) Andrew de Quincey
2003-09-06 0:57 ` [PATCH] 2.6.0-test4 ACPI fixes series (1/4) Andrew de Quincey
2003-09-06 0:57 ` [PATCH] 2.6.0-test4 ACPI fixes series (2/4) Andrew de Quincey
2003-09-06 0:57 ` [PATCH] 2.6.0-test4 ACPI fixes series (3/4) Andrew de Quincey
2003-09-06 0:57 ` [PATCH] 2.6.0-test4 ACPI fixes series (4/4) Andrew de Quincey
2003-09-06 1:22 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-06 12:27 ` [ACPI] " Andrew de Quincey
2003-09-06 13:45 ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-08 19:46 ` Mikael Pettersson
2003-09-06 15:47 ` [ACPI] " Alan Cox
2003-09-07 14:54 ` Andrew de Quincey
2003-09-07 17:59 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-07 20:19 ` Andrew de Quincey
2003-09-06 0:02 ` Chris Wright [this message]
2003-09-06 1:21 ` [ACPI] Re: [PATCH] Next round of ACPI IRQ fixes (VIA ACPI fixed) Andrew de Quincey
2003-09-06 0:30 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-09-06 2:03 ` Chris Wright
2003-09-06 12:32 ` Andrew de Quincey
2003-09-11 1:36 ` Chris Wright
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030905170224.A16217@osdlab.pdx.osdl.net \
--to=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=adq_dvb@lidskialf.net \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®