From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] add kobject to struct module
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 16:45:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030910234538.GB6719@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030911003247.V30046@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 12:32:47AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 03:24:21PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > A while ago we had talked about adding a kobject to struct module. By
> > doing this we add support for module paramaters and other module info to
> > be exported in sysfs. So here's a patch that does this that is against
> > 2.6.0-test4 (it applies with some fuzz, sorry.)
>
> Please excuse my short-sightedness, but I think the following points
> haven't been thought deeply enough:
>
> - modules which use their parameters on initialisation only once.
> (eg, 3c59x "full_duplex" parameter)
>
> - Also, what about module parameters which modules aren't expecting to
> change beneath themselves? (eg, all the watchdog modules)
>
> - Are we opening the floodgates for another round of races and driver
> updates?
If you set the "perm" portion of the module_param() macro to 0, then the
sysfs file will not be created. That will cause all of the old modules
that use the MODULE_PARAM() macro to not have things change for them, as
they will not be expecting it.
To quote from include/linux/moduleparam.h:
/* This is the fundamental function for registering boot/module
parameters. perm sets the visibility in driverfs: 000 means it's
not there, read bits mean it's readable, write bits mean it's
writable. */
Sound ok with you?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-10 23:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-09 22:24 Greg KH
2003-09-10 0:13 ` Greg KH
2003-09-10 3:31 ` Rusty Russell
2003-09-10 4:11 ` Greg KH
2003-09-10 8:07 ` Rusty Russell
2003-09-10 15:26 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-11 1:13 ` Rusty Russell
2003-09-11 6:26 ` Greg KH
2003-09-11 8:18 ` Rusty Russell
2003-09-11 17:15 ` Greg KH
2004-02-24 23:29 ` Greg KH
2004-03-05 14:34 ` Rusty Russell
2004-05-07 21:28 ` Greg KH
2003-09-10 23:06 ` Greg KH
2003-09-11 2:33 ` Rusty Russell
2003-09-10 23:32 ` Russell King
2003-09-10 23:45 ` Greg KH [this message]
2003-09-11 0:04 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-09-11 0:21 ` Greg KH
2003-09-11 2:10 ` Rusty Russell
2003-09-11 2:04 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030910234538.GB6719@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®