mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai <kiran@in.ibm.com>
To: akpm@osdl.org, manfred@colorfullife.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Robert Love <rml@tech9.net>,
	dipankar@in.ibm.com
Subject: [patch] Make slab allocator work with SLAB_MUST_HWCACHE_ALIGN
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:38:53 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030911110853.GB3700@llm08.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030911055428.GA1140@llm08.in.ibm.com>

On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 11:24:30AM +0530, Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 11:41:04AM -0400, Robert Love wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 04:16, Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote:
> > 
> > > Am I missing something or can there really be two objects on the same 
> > > cacheline even when SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN is specified?
> > 
> > No, you are right.
> > 
> > If your object _must_ be cache aligned, use SLAB_MUST_HWCACHE_ALIGN.
> > 
> 
> WOW!!!
> Looking at the code though, SLAB_MUST_HWCACHE_ALIGN is never considered
> by kmem_cache_create or kmem_cache_alloc. So, right now, there is no way of 
> getting objects which are _guaranteed_ to be cacheline aligned!!!(?)
>

Hi Andrew, Manfred
Looks like SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN does not guarantee cacheline alignment
and SLAB_MUST_HWCACHE_ALIGN is not at all recognised by the slab code.
(Right now, SLAB_MUST_HWCACHE_ALIGN caches are aligned to sizeof (void *)!!)

The following patch fixes the slab for this.  Note that I have replaced
alignment arithmetic to use ALIGN macro too.  I have done some basic
testing on a 4 way pIII with 32 byte cacheline -- but the patch probably
needs testing on other archs.  Please give it a whirl on mm* trees.  
This should help task_struct cache and pte_chain caches (other users of 
SLAB_MUST_HWCACHE_ALIGN also use SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN -- smart huh?)

I also propose to rename SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN to SLAB_MAY_HWCACHE_ALIGN since
SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN seems very misleading -- if everyone agrees.

Andrew, this also means alloc_percpu in its current form is not guaranteed
to work on machines with cacheline sizes greater than 32 bytes.  I am
working on a fix for alloc_percpu.

Thanks,
Kiran


diff -ruN -X dontdiff.1 linux-2.6.0-test5-mm1/mm/slab.c slabfix-2.6.0-test5-mm1/mm/slab.c
--- linux-2.6.0-test5-mm1/mm/slab.c	Thu Sep 11 15:08:37 2003
+++ slabfix-2.6.0-test5-mm1/mm/slab.c	Thu Sep 11 15:23:28 2003
@@ -1101,7 +1101,7 @@
 #endif
 #endif
 	align = BYTES_PER_WORD;
-	if (flags & SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN)
+	if ((flags & SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN) | (flags & SLAB_MUST_HWCACHE_ALIGN))
 		align = L1_CACHE_BYTES;
 
 	/* Determine if the slab management is 'on' or 'off' slab. */
@@ -1112,12 +1112,14 @@
 		 */
 		flags |= CFLGS_OFF_SLAB;
 
-	if (flags & SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN) {
+	if (flags & SLAB_MUST_HWCACHE_ALIGN) {
 		/* Need to adjust size so that objs are cache aligned. */
+		size = ALIGN(size, align);
+	} else if (flags & SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN) {
 		/* Small obj size, can get at least two per cache line. */
 		while (size <= align/2)
 			align /= 2;
-		size = (size+align-1)&(~(align-1));
+		size = ALIGN(size, align);
 	}
 
 	/* Cal size (in pages) of slabs, and the num of objs per slab.
@@ -1175,8 +1177,7 @@
 	}
 
 	/* Offset must be a multiple of the alignment. */
-	offset += (align-1);
-	offset &= ~(align-1);
+	offset = ALIGN(offset, align);
 	if (!offset)
 		offset = L1_CACHE_BYTES;
 	cachep->colour_off = offset;

  reply	other threads:[~2003-09-11 11:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-10  8:16 How reliable is SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN? Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2003-09-10 15:41 ` Robert Love
2003-09-11  5:54   ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2003-09-11 11:08     ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai [this message]
2003-09-11 16:19       ` [patch] Make slab allocator work with SLAB_MUST_HWCACHE_ALIGN Manfred Spraul
2003-09-11 21:49         ` Manfred Spraul
2003-09-12  8:59         ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2003-09-12  9:10           ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-09-13 20:06           ` Manfred Spraul
2003-09-13 20:58             ` Dipankar Sarma
2003-09-14  8:09             ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
2003-09-14 13:00               ` Dipankar Sarma
2003-09-15  5:13                 ` Ravikiran G Thirumalai
     [not found] <u8mV.so.19@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <ufor.30e.21@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <usvj.6s9.17@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <uxv1.5D5.23@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]       ` <uCuI.5hY.13@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]         ` <uRWI.xK.5@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]           ` <voSF.8l7.17@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-09-13 22:18             ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030911110853.GB3700@llm08.in.ibm.com \
    --to=kiran@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=rml@tech9.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®